2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Bayesian fault prediction scheme for a partially observable system subject to random failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that using only two operational states is sufficient in most practical applications (see, e.g., [16]). In many cases, the system deterioration is gradual, but to detect a severe system condition, it is important to define only two distinct phases.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that using only two operational states is sufficient in most practical applications (see, e.g., [16]). In many cases, the system deterioration is gradual, but to detect a severe system condition, it is important to define only two distinct phases.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume two operational states and one absorbing state for the covariate process. In most practical applications (see, for example, Kim et al, 2011), considering only two operational states is sufficient for fault detection and CBM. The first phase is the normal or healthy phase where the measurements of the covariate process obtained from CM behave approximately as a stationary process.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different approaches, CBM has been applied widely in various industries depending on the collected CM data, including oil data in Wang and Hussin (2009) and Kim et al (2011) or vibration data in Yam et al (2001) and Tian et al (2014). In a CBM program, maintenance action is chosen based on the information collected through CM .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The described technique will be termed probabilistic forecasting (PF) [9][10][11][12][13][14]. We emphasize that the above hypotheses regarding the stochastic properties of real datasets are almost impossible to verify, especially under small data arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%