2023
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad03d1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal batch determination for improved harmonization and prognostication of multi-center PET/CT radiomics feature in head and neck cancer

Huiqin Wu,
Xiaohui Liu,
Lihong Peng
et al.

Abstract: Objective To determine the optimal approach for identifying and mitigating batch effects in PET/CT radiomics features, and further improve the prognosis of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), this study investigated the performance of three batch harmonization methods. Approach Unsupervised harmonization identified the batch labels by K-means clustering. Supervised harmonization regarding the image acquisition factors (center, manufacturer, scanner, filter kernel) as known/given batch labels, and Combat … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study solely relied on radiomics features derived from pre-treatment PET images; however, adopting a multi-omics approach related to HNSCC could improve patient management demonstrating promising results [ 49 , 50 ]. Furthermore, implementing the Combat harmonization tool to address multicenter data variability and accounting for imaging protocol effects may further enhance the performance of the prognostic models [ 51 , 52 ]. Our study involved only a single radiologist for manual tumor segmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study solely relied on radiomics features derived from pre-treatment PET images; however, adopting a multi-omics approach related to HNSCC could improve patient management demonstrating promising results [ 49 , 50 ]. Furthermore, implementing the Combat harmonization tool to address multicenter data variability and accounting for imaging protocol effects may further enhance the performance of the prognostic models [ 51 , 52 ]. Our study involved only a single radiologist for manual tumor segmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%