2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2015.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal and receding horizon control of tumor growth in myeloma bone disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first such application was due to Swan & Vincent [33], who found the optimal treatment strategy for multiple myeloma with the objective to minimize the total amount of drugs by using the Pontryagin minimum principle (PMP) [34]. Since then, others have used the PMP in different cancer treatment problems: a chemotherapy optimization under evolving drug resistance [35][36], optimal scheduling of a vessel disruptive agent [38], MAPK inhibitors [39] input in cancer treatment, minimizing the amount of drugs prescribed in tumour-immune model [40], finding a compromise between drug toxicity and tumour repression for the myeloma bone disease [41], and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first such application was due to Swan & Vincent [33], who found the optimal treatment strategy for multiple myeloma with the objective to minimize the total amount of drugs by using the Pontryagin minimum principle (PMP) [34]. Since then, others have used the PMP in different cancer treatment problems: a chemotherapy optimization under evolving drug resistance [35][36], optimal scheduling of a vessel disruptive agent [38], MAPK inhibitors [39] input in cancer treatment, minimizing the amount of drugs prescribed in tumour-immune model [40], finding a compromise between drug toxicity and tumour repression for the myeloma bone disease [41], and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first application of optimal control theory in cancer was done by Swan and Vincent 27 who found the optimal treatment strategy for multiple myeloma with the objective to minimize the total amount of drugs used applying the Pontryagin Minimum Principle (PMP) 28 . Since then, others have used the PMP to different optimal cancer treatment problems: a chemotherapy optimization under evolving drug resistance [29][30][31] , optimal scheduling of a vessel disruptive agent 32 , MAPK inhibitors 33 input in cancer treatment, minimization amount of drugs prescribed in tumorimmune model 34 , finding compromise between drug toxicity and tumor repression for the myeloma bone disease 35 , and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the literature does not offer a concise way to quantify adverse effects on healthy cells caused by a combination of multiple drugs, we apply a mathematical regularization function to the treatment vector as an idealized measure. Prior work has used L1 [ 22 , 23 ] and L2 [ 56 ] regularization for this purpose. In our simulation study we use L1 ( R L 1 ), L2 ( R L 2 ) and sum of logs regularization ( R ln ) defined as and compare differences in resulting treatments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R �0 to the treatment vector as an idealized measure. Prior work has used L1 [22,23] and L2 [56] regularization for this purpose. In our simulation study we use L1 (R L1 ), L2 (R L2 ) and sum of logs regularization (R ln ) defined as…”
Section: Combination Treatment Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%