Optimal allocation of shared parking slots considering parking unpunctuality under a platform-based management approach

Jiang, Bowen; Fan, Zhi‐Ping

doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102062

Cited by 50 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ke et al (2020bKe et al ( , 2021b and Jacob and Roet-Green (2021) focused on the ridesharing problem in the online platform and analyzed the impact of the existence of ridesharing services and the size of ridesharing vehicles on the overall system. Jiang and Fan (2020) studied how to model and optimize the problem of inaccurate parking in a shared parking space platform. Tang et al (2021) modeled a two-stage queuing game, studied a "hybrid" system with "women-only" options and analyzed whether such a hybrid system would lead to win-win outcomes for all parties involved.…”

Section: Literature Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(2020b, 2021b) and Jacob and Roet-Green (2021) focused on the ridesharing problem in the online platform and analyzed the impact of the existence of ridesharing services and the size of ridesharing vehicles on the overall system. Jiang and Fan (2020) studied how to model and optimize the problem of inaccurate parking in a shared parking space platform. Tang et al.…”

Section: Literature Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

On-demand service platform operations management: a literature review and research agendas

Yan

Liu²,

Shi³

et al. 2022

MSCRA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe literature review aims to facilitate a broader understanding of on-demand service platform operations management and proposes potential research directions for scholars.Design/methodology/approachThis study searches four databases for relevant literature on on-demand service platform operations management and selects 72 papers for this review. According to the research context, the literature can be divided into research on “a single platform” and research on “multiple platforms”. According to the research methods, the literature can be classified into “Mathematical Models”, “Empirical Studies”, “Multiple Methods” and “Literature Review”. Through comparative analysis, we identify research gaps and propose five future research agendas.FindingsThis paper proposes five research agendas for future research on on-demand service platform operations management. First, research can be done to combine classic research problems in the field of operations management with platform characteristics. Second, both the dynamic and steady-state issues of on-demand service platforms can be further explored. Third, research employing mathematical models and empirical analysis simultaneously can be more fruitful. Fourth, more research efforts on the various interactions among two or more platforms can be pursued. Last but not least, it is worthwhile to examine new models and paths that have emerged during the latest development of the platform economy.Originality/valueThrough categorizing the literature into two research contexts as well as classifying it according to four research methods, this article clearly shows the research progresses made so far in on-demand service platform operations management and provides future research directions.

show abstract

Section: Literature Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On-demand service platform operations management: a literature review and research agendas

Yan

Liu²,

Shi³

et al. 2022

MSCRA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In subsequent studies, scholars have considered sharing platforms for urban parking spaces based on smartphone technology that involves renting personal parking spaces through a peer-to-peer market with new e-sharing methods in which the core business plan is to match parking demand and parking space pricing [18,59]. Shao, Yang, Zhang et al [60] proposed a linear 0-1 programming model to maximize operating revenue while attempting to minimize loss due to request rejection via the first-booked-first-served sequence.…”

Section: Parking Demand Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, they compared the platform's payoff and participants' utility in different auctionbased pricing strategies (e.g., a uniform price strategy and differential price strategy) and discovered the advantages of unified pricing for shared parking spaces. Other technologies, such as location tracking, parking reservation, parking space allocation, and dynamic parking permits combined with pricing principles, have been used to address the potential space and efficiency of existing shared parking infrastructure [18,19,59,62,63].…”

Section: Parking Demand Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Could the Incentive Policy of Shared Parking Be Sustainable? The Viewpoint of Personal Risk Aversion

Gao

Zheng

Jian

et al. 2022

Journal of Advanced Transportation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using an incentive measure to encourage people to share their private parking spaces could be an effective strategy for urban parking problems. This paper discusses an innovative mechanism of shared parking, “FlexPass,” which applies a reverse auction in which drivers propose bids in line with their individual expectations to share their idle parking spaces. The auction mechanism, hypotheses on bidding process principles, the competitive environment, and the risk-averse decisions of providers with regard to parking spaces are analysed to explore the sustainability of the economic benefits obtained for FlexPass parking spaces. A total of 216 respondents from the University of California, Berkeley, were invited to participate in bidding in an actual survey during their daily use of parking spaces. The analytical results show that operational rules based on risk aversion can enable profit-seeking with a bounded capability to obtain considerable economic benefits and release parking resources in an environment of demand competition. Particularly in some scenarios, FlexPass would sacrifice a certain monetary income to ensure the perceived benefits of parking space providers. With the improvement of people’s enthusiasm for participating in shared parking, the benefits to individuals and parking lots would be further enhanced, suggesting that our mechanism can operate sustainably over the long term. These findings are helpful for policymakers to formulate feasible shared parking policies from the perspective of monetary incentives.

show abstract

“…Until now, the practice-based research on the matching behavior between supply and demand of residential shared parking is rare; in particular, the data of unconstrained behavior not affected by differentiated charging policies and sharing time constraints is difficult to obtain. However, there are a few relevant papers that contribute to the matching mechanisms between private parking spot sharing and rental demand, but these studies did not validate their results with real or recent data [12][13][14][15]. In fact, there remain a lot of issues in the practice of shared parking that need to be addressed and studied.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Evaluation of Residential Parking Spots Sharing Effects Based on Practical Experience

Zhang

Chen

2021

Journal of Advanced Transportation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Making residential parking spots available to the public has become popularized in recent years. The sharing of residential parking spots can promote the further use of parking space and enhance the utility of parking resources in urban metropolitan areas. However, little is known about the relationship between spots’ physical or temporal factors and rental effects from practical experience. This study aims to evaluate the effects of residential parking spot sharing from both individual and social benefit perspectives. One-year real behavioral records concerning parking spots’ owners and borrowers were obtained, and the field survey of various parking spots’ physical characteristics was conducted. Two Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) models emphasizing the individual and societal points of view were adopted. Results revealed that the spots’ physical factors, including spot type, visibility, ease of parking, and distances to major surrounding buildings, along with owners’ sharing willingness and preferences, tend to pose significant influences on the rental effects from both individual and social benefit perspectives. Some differences were also discovered between the two models. For the individual model, owners’ sharing willingness was the dominant factor affecting the parking spots’ sharing effects, while for the social model, parking spots’ physical characteristics appear to be more important in determining the sharing effects. Based on these findings, suggestions were discussed to promote residential parking spot sharing and increase the benefits of sharing to individuals and society.

show abstract

Optimal allocation of shared parking slots considering parking unpunctuality under a platform-based management approach

Cited by 50 publications

References 30 publications

On-demand service platform operations management: a literature review and research agendas

On-demand service platform operations management: a literature review and research agendas

Could the Incentive Policy of Shared Parking Be Sustainable? The Viewpoint of Personal Risk Aversion

Evaluation of Residential Parking Spots Sharing Effects Based on Practical Experience

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About