2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b01173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optically Controlled Drug Release from Light-Sensitive Liposomes with the New Photosensitizer 5,10-DiOH

Abstract: The delivery of therapeutic drugs to a specific cellular site is a challenge in the treatment of different diseases. Liposomes have been widely studied as vehicles for drug delivery, and recent research begins to show the potential of the light-controlled opening of liposomes. Liposomes with photoactive molecules can release their cargo upon light irradiation for localized drug release. Light as an external trigger can be controlled temporally and spatially with high precision. In this study, we investigate th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most currently available PSs for APDT have poor solubility in water, showing a strong tendency to aggregate, ultimately leading to poor PDT efficacy . To improve their hydrophilicity, a variety of modification methods were applied by physical encapsulation or chemical covalent conjugation of PSs to nanocarriers such as peptide NPs, polymer NPs, and liposomes . However, these surface modification methods are time-consuming and usually bring some unexpected consequences such as low biocompatibility, which may compromise the clinical application of APDT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most currently available PSs for APDT have poor solubility in water, showing a strong tendency to aggregate, ultimately leading to poor PDT efficacy . To improve their hydrophilicity, a variety of modification methods were applied by physical encapsulation or chemical covalent conjugation of PSs to nanocarriers such as peptide NPs, polymer NPs, and liposomes . However, these surface modification methods are time-consuming and usually bring some unexpected consequences such as low biocompatibility, which may compromise the clinical application of APDT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 To improve their hydrophilicity, a variety of modification methods were applied by physical encapsulation or chemical covalent conjugation of PSs to nanocarriers such as peptide NPs, 21 polymer NPs, 22 and liposomes. 23 However, these surface modification methods are time-consuming and usually bring some unexpected consequences such as low biocompatibility, which may compromise the clinical application of APDT. Another issue that plagues APDT is the need of ultraviolet (UV) light for some PSs such as metal oxide NPs, zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs, and titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) NPs, 24 for the reason that UV light is cytotoxic to human cells and has poor penetration.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similar approach was used in [136], where the embedment of photosensitizers BPD, AlPcS 2 , Ce6 and 5,10-DiOH into the lipid membrane of liposomes as light triggers promoted the release of the calcein upon irradiation (Figure 9). Liposomal formulations with BPD, AlPcS 2 or Ce6 released calcein from 90% to 100% after 10 min of irradiation.…”
Section: Lipid Formulations: Modification With Macrocycles (Cyclodextrins Calixarenes and Porphyrins)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sense‐and‐response functions can be facilitated directly via changes in SC membrane structure. Membranes have been composed of molecules sensitive to temperature (Jose et al, 2019; F. Liu, Kozlovskaya, et al, 2015; Needham et al, 2000; Ta et al, 2014; Tagami et al, 2011; Xi et al, 2020; Yatvin et al, 1978), light (Carter et al, 2014; Enzian et al, 2020; D. Luo et al, 2016; Miranda & Lovell, 2016; Peyret et al, 2017), magnetism (Amstad et al, 2011; Babincová et al, 2002; Geilich et al, 2017; H. Guo et al, 2015; H. Oliveira et al, 2013), acoustics (Z. Deng et al, 2016; Rwei et al, 2017; Shekhar et al, 2017), pH (Aghdam et al, 2019; De Leo et al, 2018; Naziris et al, 2017), redox states (Chi et al, 2017; Mirhadi et al, 2020; X. Yin et al, 2017), and enzymes (Haas et al, 2015; Thamphiwatana et al, 2014). By combining these materials, the membrane can sometimes be made sensitive to multiple types of stimuli (S. Feng et al, 2019; Tran et al, 2017), enabling even more precise targeting.…”
Section: Applications Of Synthetic Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%