2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.787858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical turbulence and outer scales above Dome C in Antarctica

Abstract: Dome C in Antarctica is a particular astronomical site when considering the optical turbulence conditions. From the first winterover campaign performed in 2005 at Dome C, the set of 34 meteorological balloon profiles has been analyzed. The meteorological balloons were equipped with microthermal sensors used to sense the vertical profile of the optical turbulence intensity C 2 n. The C 2 n median profile, mean temperature and mean horizontal wind speed are given. The C 2 n median profile is characterized by a v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of the model to forecast the evolution of the atmosphere and the optical turbulence above the Antarctic Plateau has been extensively discussed in a previous paper by our team . In that paper all the 15 winter nights, for which measurements of the C 2 N are available (Trinquet et al 2008) above Dome C, have been simulated with Meso-NH. The main conclusion of was that Meso-NH was able to reconstruct the optical turbulence in a region with extreme meteorological conditions such as Dome C. However a mono-domain configura-⋆ E-mail: lascaux@arcetri.astro.it; masciadri@arcetri.astro.it tion with low resolution (100 km) is not suitable to provide optical turbulence features well correlated to measurements while a grid-nesting configuration done with three domains (horizontal resolutions of 25 km, 10 km and 1 km) does it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of the model to forecast the evolution of the atmosphere and the optical turbulence above the Antarctic Plateau has been extensively discussed in a previous paper by our team . In that paper all the 15 winter nights, for which measurements of the C 2 N are available (Trinquet et al 2008) above Dome C, have been simulated with Meso-NH. The main conclusion of was that Meso-NH was able to reconstruct the optical turbulence in a region with extreme meteorological conditions such as Dome C. However a mono-domain configura-⋆ E-mail: lascaux@arcetri.astro.it; masciadri@arcetri.astro.it tion with low resolution (100 km) is not suitable to provide optical turbulence features well correlated to measurements while a grid-nesting configuration done with three domains (horizontal resolutions of 25 km, 10 km and 1 km) does it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The very low infrared background and atmospheric watervapour content of Antarctic plateau sites such as Dome C enable a telescope based there to achieve the sensitivity (at some wavelengths) of a telescope over three times that diameter located elsewhere (Lawrence 2004;Walden et al 2005;Tomasi et al 2006). The atmospheric turbulence above Dome C is also 2 to 3 times lower than that at even the best temperate sites (Lawrence et al 2004;Agabi et al 2006;Trinquet et al 2008). An optical/infrared telescope at Dome C would thus be supremely powerful for its size, enjoying not only a substantial advantage in both sensitivity and photometric precision, but also having a wide-field, high-resolution, high-cadence imaging capability otherwise achievable only from space Mosser & Aristidi 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…• excellent free-atmospheric seeing (Lawrence et al 2004;Agabi et al 2006;Trinquet et al 2008), • low turbulent boundary layer height (Lawrence et al 2004;Agabi et al 2006;Trinquet et al 2008), • wide isoplanatic angle and long coherence time (Lawrence et al 2004;Agabi et al 2006;Trinquet et al 2008), • low atmospheric scintillation ),…”
Section: Dome C Site Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bufton et al [18] measured turbulence in the troposphere by thermal sensor, then reduced its weight to less than 3 kg, and operated in only two scale ranges from a temperature difference noise level of 0.004 to a maximum temperature difference of 0.676 K [19], [20]. Azout et al [21] presented in situ technique to measure the microstructure of the temperature field in atmosphere, which gained the structure function of refractive index along with atmospheric pressure, temperature, humidity, and wind speed. This cross-calibrated technique gave a higher spatiotemporal resolution than before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%