2005
DOI: 10.1364/opex.13.001260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical trapping force with annular and doughnut laser beams based on vectorial diffraction

Abstract: The inadequacy of the optical trapping model based on ray optics in the case of describing the optical trapping performance of annular and doughnut laser beams is discussed. The inadequacy originates from neglecting the complex focused field distributions of such beams, such as polarization and phase, and thus leads to erroneous predictions of trapping force. Instead, the optical trapping model based on the vectorial diffraction theory, which considers the exact field distributions of a beam in the focal regio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference of the trapping efficiency between the two types of beads becomes smaller as the size of the particles increase. The trapping efficiency for dielectric beads of diameter 25 mm approaches the value predicated by the ray optics model, 18 while the trapping efficiency for fluorescent beads of the same size is slightly decreased because the focal spot of the laser beam is much smaller than the bead, and only a small fraction of the bead volume is excited. The trapping efficiency of fluorescent beads of diameter 10 mm is approximately five times higher than the trapping efficiency of dielectric beads of the same size because the two-photon absorption under the low NA objective occurs within an interaction cross-section of the microbeads larger than the scattering cross-section, due to the greater surface-to-volume ratio.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference of the trapping efficiency between the two types of beads becomes smaller as the size of the particles increase. The trapping efficiency for dielectric beads of diameter 25 mm approaches the value predicated by the ray optics model, 18 while the trapping efficiency for fluorescent beads of the same size is slightly decreased because the focal spot of the laser beam is much smaller than the bead, and only a small fraction of the bead volume is excited. The trapping efficiency of fluorescent beads of diameter 10 mm is approximately five times higher than the trapping efficiency of dielectric beads of the same size because the two-photon absorption under the low NA objective occurs within an interaction cross-section of the microbeads larger than the scattering cross-section, due to the greater surface-to-volume ratio.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In the case of dielectric beads, the trapping efficiency under the low NA illumination condition decreases when their size is reduced, which is consistent with the previous observation for high NA objective trapping. 18 Because the NA of nonlinear optical endoscopy is low, the trapping efficiency of dielectric beads is approximately 4.2310 26 for nanobeads of diameter 100 nm, and no trapping can be achieved when the trapping power is less than 35 mW. The difference of the trapping efficiency between the two types of beads becomes smaller as the size of the particles increase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Double-beam subdiffraction lithography using two beams and direct laser writing also use a doughnutlike spot [2,3]. Another fascinating application is optical trapping, where the central dark zone of the doughnut spot is used to trap and manipulate tiny objects that are repelled and pushed away from the regions of maximum intensity [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with doughnut beams have been investigated [34][35][36][37][38][39] in liquids. Here, we focus on the problem in vacuum which has low friction and low dissipation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%