2013
DOI: 10.5194/amt-6-1189-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical thickness and effective radius of Arctic boundary-layer clouds retrieved from airborne nadir and imaging spectrometry

Abstract: Abstract. Arctic boundary-layer clouds in the vicinity of Svalbard (78° N, 15° E) were observed with airborne remote sensing and in situ methods. The cloud optical thickness and the droplet effective radius are retrieved from spectral radiance data from the nadir spot (1.5°, 350–2100 nm) and from a nadir-centred image (40°, 400–1000 nm). Two approaches are used for the nadir retrieval, combining the signal from either two or five wavelengths. Two wavelengths are found to be sufficient for an accurate retrieval… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The albedo contrast in such areas is the highest we can observe on Earth. For visible wavelengths, the albedo of open water is low (0.042 at 645 nm; Bowker et al, 1985), while that of ice-/snow-covered ocean is high (0.91 at 645 nm; Bowker et al, 1985). These differences significantly decrease in the near-infrared wavelength range (α water = 0.01 and α snow = 0.04 at λ = 1.6 µm wavelength; Bowker et al, 1985), but still slightly alter the radiative transfer.…”
Section: Schäfer Et Al: 3-d Influence Of Ice Edges On Radiative Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The albedo contrast in such areas is the highest we can observe on Earth. For visible wavelengths, the albedo of open water is low (0.042 at 645 nm; Bowker et al, 1985), while that of ice-/snow-covered ocean is high (0.91 at 645 nm; Bowker et al, 1985). These differences significantly decrease in the near-infrared wavelength range (α water = 0.01 and α snow = 0.04 at λ = 1.6 µm wavelength; Bowker et al, 1985), but still slightly alter the radiative transfer.…”
Section: Schäfer Et Al: 3-d Influence Of Ice Edges On Radiative Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, more extensive simulations with detailed sensitivity studies concerning the various governing parameters are necessary here together with similar comparisons to field data, which should also cover different thermodynamic situations (e.g., moisture, temperature above the To analyze this phenomenon in a higher resolution a holographic instrument capable of detecting particles in a three-dimensional sample volume of a few cm 3 in a single snapshot (Spuler and Fugal, 2011;Schlenczek et al 2014) allows investigation of still smaller mixing scales for both size modes. Also new imaging remote sensing techniques (e.g., as presented by Bierwirth et al, 2013) could help to identify the horizontal variability of the cloud top regions on different scales and thus to quantify the interplay between eddy driven mixing and cloud microphysical processes.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Arctic Study of Tropospheric Aerosols, clouds and Radiation experiments (ASTAR; Herber et al, 2004;Jourdan et al, 2010;Ehrlich et al, 2009;Gayet et al, 2009;Lampert et al, 2009) iii. The Polar Study using Aircraft, Remote Sensing, Surface Measurements and Models, of Climate, Chemistry, Aerosols, and Transport (POLARCAT-France; Delanoë et al, 2013;Law et al, 2008;Quennehen et al, 2011) Bierwirth et al, 2013) was performed in the Svalbard region in May 2010 with the AWI Polar-5 aircraft.…”
Section: Airborne Campaignsmentioning
confidence: 99%