2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical soot characterization using two-color laser-induced incandescence (2C-LII) in the soot growth region of a premixed flat flame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
97
2
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
12
97
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The E(m) values at 1064 nm at different HABs are also reported in Table 1. It shows an increase in E(m) at 1064 nm with increasing HAB in accordance with the results of an earlier study conducted by Bladh et al [11]. It is worth pointing out these E(m) values at 1064 nm should not be considered as accurate due to the use of density and heat capacity for mature soot, due to the unavailability of such thermal properties for young and immature soot, used in the determination of E(m) values in the growth region of the flat rich premixed methane flame.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Absolute Absorption Function At 1064 Nmsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The E(m) values at 1064 nm at different HABs are also reported in Table 1. It shows an increase in E(m) at 1064 nm with increasing HAB in accordance with the results of an earlier study conducted by Bladh et al [11]. It is worth pointing out these E(m) values at 1064 nm should not be considered as accurate due to the use of density and heat capacity for mature soot, due to the unavailability of such thermal properties for young and immature soot, used in the determination of E(m) values in the growth region of the flat rich premixed methane flame.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Absolute Absorption Function At 1064 Nmsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There seems a consensus in the literature that this value falls in the range of about 0.2-0.4, i.e., with a uncertainty of about a factor of 2. Nevertheless, investigations conducted so far tend to support that E(m) seems dependent on the type of fuel and the maturation of the soot particle [11][12][13]. It is well known that the soot absorption function is difficult to determine accurately and many methods have been proposed [12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of absorption function E(m) for mature soot in the visible and near-infrared is about 0.3 to 0.4 (Snelling et al 2004;Bladh et al 2011;Bejaoui et al 2015). For incipient soot, however, the value of E(m) is likely somewhat lower based on recent studies (Bladh et al 2011;Bejaoui et al 2015) and likely dependent on the degree of soot maturity (L opez-Yglesias et al 2014;Simonsson et al 2015), which cannot be easily quantified.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Second, the TEM images of these nascent particles have poor contrast and the particle structure is prone to be damaged by the electron beam Schenk et al 2013). Due to these limitations, the smallest soot particles measured by the TEM approach are typically about 10 nm Bladh et al 2011). Only a few studies using TEM have reported particles as small as 5 nm (Simonsson et al 2017;Zhang et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the particle size and physical properties of soot may change as a function of height above burner. In particular, a variation of E(m) with vertical position has been noted in ethylene-air flat flames by other authors [32,33]. Since both the prompt LII and the photoacoustic measurement generate a signal that is dependent on the absorption of laser light by soot, such variation in E(m) may introduce experimental errors in each technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%