2015
DOI: 10.3390/s151229864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Sensors and Methods for Underwater 3D Reconstruction

Abstract: This paper presents a survey on optical sensors and methods for 3D reconstruction in underwater environments. The techniques to obtain range data have been listed and explained, together with the different sensor hardware that makes them possible. The literature has been reviewed, and a classification has been proposed for the existing solutions. New developments, commercial solutions and previous reviews in this topic have also been gathered and considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(153 reference statements)
1
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our conclusion is consistent with the study by Starr and Lattimer [1]. Some specialized subsea LiDAR systems (please refer to Massot-Campos and Oliver-Codina [2] for a comprehensive survey of underwater 3D reconstruction), laser line scanning [3] or structured light [4,5,6,7] are able to operate in scattering media. However, these systems are power-consuming, slow, and bulky and thus they are not well suited for a walking robot.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our conclusion is consistent with the study by Starr and Lattimer [1]. Some specialized subsea LiDAR systems (please refer to Massot-Campos and Oliver-Codina [2] for a comprehensive survey of underwater 3D reconstruction), laser line scanning [3] or structured light [4,5,6,7] are able to operate in scattering media. However, these systems are power-consuming, slow, and bulky and thus they are not well suited for a walking robot.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…An exhaustive survey on underwater 3D reconstruction methods can be found in [21]. The majority of approaches for underwater 3D reconstruction rely on standard SfM methods assuming the adapted pinhole camera model [12,16], however, this often leads to inaccurate 3D reconstruction [20].…”
Section: Prior Work On Underwater Sfmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active underwater depth estimation methods have been proposed in the past few years like the ones by Maccarone et al [1] and Bruno et al [2]. The article by Campos et al [16] gives an overview of different sensors and methods that have been used for underwater 3D. For single image depth estimation, the dark channel prior (DCP) [17] was one of the first methods to be used.…”
Section: Underwater Depth Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%