1966
DOI: 10.1364/josa.56.001372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Resolution Through a Randomly Inhomogeneous Medium for Very Long and Very Short Exposures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
600
0
20

Year Published

1971
1971
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,386 publications
(624 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
600
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning visual measurements, the CCD results have a great advantage since they should be free from personal bias. On the other hand, they allow a measure of the image quality expressed by the seeing parameter of Fried (1966) which can be related to errors affecting the solar radius measurements (Irbah et al 1994). However, and at least for the time being, this advantages could have only a formal character, since as we have shown in this paper, in practice, CCD measurements of the solar diameter with an astrolabe can be strongly affected by systematic effects that produce quite significant distorsion of the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Concerning visual measurements, the CCD results have a great advantage since they should be free from personal bias. On the other hand, they allow a measure of the image quality expressed by the seeing parameter of Fried (1966) which can be related to errors affecting the solar radius measurements (Irbah et al 1994). However, and at least for the time being, this advantages could have only a formal character, since as we have shown in this paper, in practice, CCD measurements of the solar diameter with an astrolabe can be strongly affected by systematic effects that produce quite significant distorsion of the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the simulations, we will assume that the only aberrations are those introduced by atmospheric turbulence, setting the ratio of the telescope diameter, D, to the Fried Parameter, r 0 , equal to ten (Fried 1966). We could also generalize the simulations to include static and dynamic telescope aberrations.…”
Section: Reconstruction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we will apply the methods to a complex extended object, once again varying the photons per frame. We assume that the only aberrations are those introduced by atmospheric turbulence setting the ratio of the telescope diameter, D, to the Fried Parameter, r 0 , equal to ten (Fried 1966). Additionally, we assume that the focalplane detector array is photon-noise limited, the illumination is narrow-band (essentially monochromatic) and the atmosphere is Article published by EDP Sciences A58, page 1 of 7 static during each data frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, for a given laser wavelength and propagation distance L, the turbulence problem is governed by the three free parameters C 2 n , L 0 and l 0 . An important quantity is the Fried parameter r 0 (coherence length) [10], scaling as 6∕5 ∶ Physically, the Fried parameter may be regarded as the aperture of a fictive telescope over which the rms phase differences between any two points remain in the order of one radian. That means, a telescope with aperture r 0 in the absence of turbulence (i.e., diffraction-limited) has the same image resolution as any telescope under turbulence conditions having an aperture arbitrarily larger than r 0 .…”
Section: Theoretical Basis Of Laser Beam Propagation In Turbulent Atmmentioning
confidence: 99%