2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13224638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Remote Sensing Indexes of Soil Moisture: Evaluation and Improvement Based on Aircraft Experiment Observations

Abstract: Optical remote sensing (about 0.4~2.0 μm) indexes of soil moisture (SM) are valuable for some specific applications such as monitoring agricultural drought and downscaling microwave SM, due to their abundant data sources, higher spatial resolution, and easy-to-use features, etc. In this study, we evaluated thirteen typical optical SM indexes with aircraft and in situ observed SM from two field campaigns, the Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2012 (SMAPVEX12) and 2016 (SMAPVEX16) conducted in M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acharya et al [52] obtained a weak relationship between soil moisture and vegetation indices (NDVI, NDMI, NDWI, EVI, ARVI, SIPI) with R 2 ranging from 2 × 10 −6 to 0.072. Sun et al [53] obtained the best performance among the thirteen optical soil moisture indices as compared with aircraft and in situ observed soil moisture for the visible and short-wave infrared drought index VSDI, which was comparable with the OPTRAM result. Further research is required to validate the OPTRAM model and to check the accuracy of the vegetation indices.…”
Section: Vegetation Indices Accuracymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Acharya et al [52] obtained a weak relationship between soil moisture and vegetation indices (NDVI, NDMI, NDWI, EVI, ARVI, SIPI) with R 2 ranging from 2 × 10 −6 to 0.072. Sun et al [53] obtained the best performance among the thirteen optical soil moisture indices as compared with aircraft and in situ observed soil moisture for the visible and short-wave infrared drought index VSDI, which was comparable with the OPTRAM result. Further research is required to validate the OPTRAM model and to check the accuracy of the vegetation indices.…”
Section: Vegetation Indices Accuracymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The smaller difference between the aggregated SM and original SM demonstrates the better performance of the downscaling method. Additionally, four metrics were used in the evaluation including unbiased root-mean-square error (ubRMSE), root-mean-square error (RMSE), bias (defined as estimated data minus reference data), and R. The equations of these metrics can be found in [12].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the remote sensing methods of SM can be roughly classified into optical data-dominated methods, thermal data-dominated methods, and microwave data-dominated methods. The optical datadominated methods are chiefly based on the spectral reflectance characteristics of soil and vegetation to identify varied SM statuses [12]. The thermal data-dominated methods are primarily based on the thermal radiation or thermal inertia of soil and vegetation to describe the variation of SM [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sites are in Ireland, a country which typifies a temperate, high-rainfall climate [29] with intensive agriculture. OPTRAM has been used to estimate soil moisture from Landsat [16], S-2 [30,31] and MODIS [32][33][34]. These studies were conducted in crop fields in arid or semi-arid climates, which are quite different from the climatic conditions in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%