2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2008.03.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical protein sensor for detecting cancer markers in saliva

Abstract: A surface immobilized optical protein sensor has been utilized to detect Interleukin-8 (IL-8) protein, an oral cancer marker, and can reach limit of detection (LOD) at 1.1 pM in buffer without using enzymatic amplification. Only after applying enzymatic amplification to increase the signal level by a few orders of magnitude, ELISA can reach the LOD of 1pm level. We then develop the confocal optics based sensor for further reducing the optical noise and can extend the LOD of the surface immobilized optical prot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improved detection limits have been reported for uorescence 34 and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensing. 35 SERS, however, offers the additional unique spectral multiplexing advantage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved detection limits have been reported for uorescence 34 and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensing. 35 SERS, however, offers the additional unique spectral multiplexing advantage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The other is an electrochemical DNA sensor 2,3 that exploits a steric hindrance scheme to suppress nonspecific signals.…”
Section: Figure 1 Detection Volume Comparison Of (A) Fluorescent Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining electric field control with hairpin probes, the limit of detection for RNA is about 0.4fM, which is 10,000-fold more sensitive than conventional linear probes. 1,3 By extending the sensitivity of these techniques, without the need for enzymatic amplification steps, we have expanded the range of detection for these biosensors while maintaining their simplicity. The resultant methods are well suited for point-ofcare detection of specific biomarkers within complex bodily fluids such as saliva and are a significant advance toward routine molecular diagnostics in the clinical setting.…”
Section: Figure 2 Illustration Of the Specific Signal Amplification mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salivary diagnostics is much more convenient than biopsy or blood test: sample collection is simple, non-invasive and, therefore, not painful (Martin et al, 2012;Soini et al, 2010;Streckfus and Bigler, 2002). With respect to the gastric cancer screening, saliva is commonly analyzed for the presence of abnormal genetic material, or of specific biomarkers, which are detected by analyte-specific interactions using immunoassay arrays (Ivnitski et al, 2004;Jokerst et al, 2009;Tan et al, 2008). While these techniques are effective in early detection of gastric cancer, they are less appropriate for fast and high throughput screening, particularly outside of medical facilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%