The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1134/s0030400x16030176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Properties of Zinc(II) and Boron(III) Dipyrrinates with Different Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this has not observed experimentally. 7,13,14,16,17 Instead, the opposite trend was observed when comparing di-iodine and dibromine-substituted compounds, where I 2 -tetraphenyl-aBDP exhibits a quite high quantum fluorescence of about γ = 0.33, whereas Br 2tetraphenyl-aBDP has almost negligible fluorescence with γ = 0.03 and Cl 2 -tetraphenyl-aBDP again appears to display a smaller rate of ISC, with γ = 0.28. These experimental results agreed well with the observed generation of photosensitized ( 1 O 2 ) by these molecules, where the most effective sensitization was not for the I 2 -substituted compound, having a triplet yield of 0.12, but rather for the Br 2 -substituted sensitizer (triplet yield of 0.83−0.89).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, this has not observed experimentally. 7,13,14,16,17 Instead, the opposite trend was observed when comparing di-iodine and dibromine-substituted compounds, where I 2 -tetraphenyl-aBDP exhibits a quite high quantum fluorescence of about γ = 0.33, whereas Br 2tetraphenyl-aBDP has almost negligible fluorescence with γ = 0.03 and Cl 2 -tetraphenyl-aBDP again appears to display a smaller rate of ISC, with γ = 0.28. These experimental results agreed well with the observed generation of photosensitized ( 1 O 2 ) by these molecules, where the most effective sensitization was not for the I 2 -substituted compound, having a triplet yield of 0.12, but rather for the Br 2 -substituted sensitizer (triplet yield of 0.83−0.89).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, this has not observed experimentally. 7,13,14,16,17 Instead, the opposite trend was observed when comparing di-iodine and di-bromine substituted compounds, where I 2 -tetraphenyl-aBDP exhibits a quite high quantum fluorescence of about γ=0.33, whereas Br 2 -tetraphenyl-aBDP has almost negligible fluorescence with γ=0.03 and Cl 2 -tetraphenyl-aBDP again appears to display a smaller rate of ISC, with γ=0.28.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, intramolecular electron transfer to form the CS state becomes competitive with the radiative decay from the S 1 state. The T 1 state in these zinc complexes is nonemissive at room temperature, but phosphorescence has been observed at 77 K. 33,34 The T 1 state has also been observed in room-temperature solution by transient absorption spectroscopy, 29,30 but to our knowledge, the yield of triplet state formation in these complexes has not been investigated. In our quest to design viable zinc-based photosensitizers, it is important to understand which factors influence ISC efficiency to rationally design chromophores with the highest possible triplet state yields.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%