2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.155207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical properties of cubic GaN from 1 to 20 eV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
61
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
8
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting spectrum (thick black line) is compared to the previous calculation of Benedict et al 12 (dashed red line) which is performed in a LDA basis without including the EP interaction. The present calculation, instead, is in excellent agreement with the T = 10K experimental spectrum 6 (green bold line) and largely improves the Benedict result. We notice, indeed, that, compared to the Benedict calculation, the position and width of the main peak is in very good agreement with the experiment.…”
Section: Finite Temperature Optical Absorption Spectra Including supporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting spectrum (thick black line) is compared to the previous calculation of Benedict et al 12 (dashed red line) which is performed in a LDA basis without including the EP interaction. The present calculation, instead, is in excellent agreement with the T = 10K experimental spectrum 6 (green bold line) and largely improves the Benedict result. We notice, indeed, that, compared to the Benedict calculation, the position and width of the main peak is in very good agreement with the experiment.…”
Section: Finite Temperature Optical Absorption Spectra Including supporting
confidence: 77%
“…In this case electron-electron correlation only has been included, by means of the well known GW approximation 14 . The corresponding quasi-particle (QP) gap, calculated by using the one-shot GW approximation on top of KohnShame (KS) HSE hybrid orbital (HSE+G 0 W 0 ) 6,15 , is 3.427 eV, which overestimates the experimental value of 3.295 eV 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, although the strong difference of SðtÞ for 370 and 380 nm indicates that the photoelastic effect is probably the dominant contribution, a detailed analysis is performed to exclude that the interface mechanism is responsible for the found behavior. In the beginning, we restrict our simulations to the photoelastic effect in the 100-nm GaN bulklike layer and the interface mechanism, since the complex index of refraction dispersion is known only for bulk material [20] but not for the QW. A model to calculate the reflectivity change ΔR normalized to the unperturbed value R 0 , which covers both effects, was developed before and is applied here to our experiment [12,21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently a comprehensive study of the optical properties of cubic GaN in the near-band-gap excitonic region has been published. 9 More recently, the anharmonic phonon decay in c-GaN has been investigated by means of Raman scattering. 10 Whereas Brillouin scattering measurements providing a reliable experimental determinaton of the elastics constants were reported in wurtzite GaN, 11,12 the present knowledge of the elastic constants of cubic GaN comes mainly from molecular-dynamics and densityfunctional-theory calculations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%