2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.80.205428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical properties of cluster-assembled nanoporous gold films

Abstract: We report a spectroscopic ellipsometry investigation of the electronic and morphological properties of\ud cluster-assembled nanoporous metallic gold films deposited from a low-energy supersonic cluster beam. We\ud modeled the optical response of the medium by explicitly introducing a variable degree of porosity in the film\ud and finite-size effects due to the cluster nanometeric size. We deduced the characteristic size of the individual\ud clusters within the nanoporous structure and their depth-resolved arra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(65 reference statements)
6
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our nanogranular Ag and Ag/TiO 2 nanocomposite (Ag/Ti 50-50) films shows a typical surface roughness and porosity quite lower than the ones observed for other films deposited by SCBD, either the Au films analyzed by Bisio [39] or the bare TiO 2 films in the works of Singh [46] and Toccafondi [47]. This difference could be traced back to different growth parameters of the sources, mainly the type of carrier gas (Ar or He) and different carrier injection pressure in the ablation chamber, anyway a sound motivation for these differences needs further investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our nanogranular Ag and Ag/TiO 2 nanocomposite (Ag/Ti 50-50) films shows a typical surface roughness and porosity quite lower than the ones observed for other films deposited by SCBD, either the Au films analyzed by Bisio [39] or the bare TiO 2 films in the works of Singh [46] and Toccafondi [47]. This difference could be traced back to different growth parameters of the sources, mainly the type of carrier gas (Ar or He) and different carrier injection pressure in the ablation chamber, anyway a sound motivation for these differences needs further investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The model of bulk Au optical constants was corrected by the size dependent term Δ ε , similar to that appearing in Equation (2), to obtain the model dielectric function for the Au NPs films and even possible gradients of film densities and surface roughness were considered by implementation of multiple BEMA layers model with different void factors [39]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at ψ plots acquired on bare ns-Au, substraterelated peaked features can be identified in the range below 450 nm. The steep slope in the 490-560-nm range in the vis-NIR spectral range is instead related to the presence of the gold nano-grains as already discussed for similar samples [13]. Adsorption of molecules induces small yet fully appreciable changes which are best viewed in Fig.…”
Section: In Situ Difference Spectramentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The nanostructured films considered here had a nominal thickness of ≈40 nm; SE checks confirmed this thickness suggesting a variability of ±15%. The asdeposited granular Au films exhibit a high nanoscale porosity and surface roughness [13][14][15]; their morphology is affected by ageing phenomena [14]. In this experiment, we used films a few days after production, whose ageing dynamics was sufficiently cold that variation of SE spectra was negligible in comparison of the molecular-induced changes in the time scale of the adsorption experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation