Semiconductor Optics
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-26846-4_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Properties of Bound and Localized Excitons and of Defect States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature dependence of the luminescence spectra of localized excitons qualitatively agrees with our proposed model, indicating that the model can be developed for a general case (i.e., 3D, 2D, 1D, 0D) for localized excitons such that it reproduces, quantitatively, all the anomalous temperature behaviors of localized-state luminescence. The main reason this model can be generalized is that the model of such localized electronic states is assumed to be a distribution function of energy and is expected to be an ensemble with a Gaussian-type density of states [32][33][34]. It is important to note that the main difference between 2D TMDCs and GaAs quantum wells is the much smaller size of the exciton Bohr radius (∼0.5 nm) in a TMDC ML, compared to ∼10 nm in GaAs quantum wells [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature dependence of the luminescence spectra of localized excitons qualitatively agrees with our proposed model, indicating that the model can be developed for a general case (i.e., 3D, 2D, 1D, 0D) for localized excitons such that it reproduces, quantitatively, all the anomalous temperature behaviors of localized-state luminescence. The main reason this model can be generalized is that the model of such localized electronic states is assumed to be a distribution function of energy and is expected to be an ensemble with a Gaussian-type density of states [32][33][34]. It is important to note that the main difference between 2D TMDCs and GaAs quantum wells is the much smaller size of the exciton Bohr radius (∼0.5 nm) in a TMDC ML, compared to ∼10 nm in GaAs quantum wells [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong quantum confinement and reduced dielectric screening favours the formation of Coulomb-bound quasiparticle complexes [14][15][16] , including those bound to atomic crystal defects. Bound excitons in 2D TMDs can stem from different origins such as two-body type [17][18][19] where at least one of the two particles, electron and hole, is strongly localized to a defect, and three-or fourbody type 20,21 , which can be described as a free exciton bound to a neutral or charged defect 22,23 . Interestingly, in both cases, bound excitons can be partially composed of Bloch states such that the valley degree of freedom can be accessed 23,24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%