“…n x < n y < n z -and was therefore contrary to n z > n x reported in [8]. It was suggested that the result observed in [8] was occasioned by mistaken axis labeling. Moreover, the 40 largest measured birefringence was n z − n x = 0.42, rather than 0.35 as reported in [8], which was ascribed to failure to observe the highest refractive index.…”