2005
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200500018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical polarimetry of SN 2004bv

Abstract: Abstract. We report R band imaging polarimetry of SN 2004bv in NGC 6907 on June 19.299 (UT middle of observation), i.e., two weeks after maximum. We have obtained [0.11 ± 0.02]% at position angle 118.• 7 for the observed polarization. The average foreground polarization from field objects was estimated to be [0.12 ± 0.02]% at PA 163.• 4, consistent with the low reddening towards the SN. Spectroscopy reported elsewhere does not show the Na I D line in the SN spectrum suggesting that the interstellar polarizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no published spectropolarimetric data for SN 1991T-like or SN 2002cx-like objects to act as a basis for comparison with SN 2005hk, but there are a few relevant measurements. SN 2004bv had an early-time spectrum that showed prominent Fe III lines like SN 1991T (Foley et al 2004), andPereyra &Magalhães (2005) obtained a single epoch of R-band imaging polarimetry two weeks after maximum light. They found a polarization of 0.11% ± 0.02%, consistent with the polarization of the foreground stars in their field and therefore with low intrinsic supernova polarization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no published spectropolarimetric data for SN 1991T-like or SN 2002cx-like objects to act as a basis for comparison with SN 2005hk, but there are a few relevant measurements. SN 2004bv had an early-time spectrum that showed prominent Fe III lines like SN 1991T (Foley et al 2004), andPereyra &Magalhães (2005) obtained a single epoch of R-band imaging polarimetry two weeks after maximum light. They found a polarization of 0.11% ± 0.02%, consistent with the polarization of the foreground stars in their field and therefore with low intrinsic supernova polarization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%