AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-7719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Navigation Plan and Strategy for the Lunar Lander Altair; OpNav for Lunar and other Crewed and Robotic Exploration Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such capabilities include perception, feature tracking for motion estimation, 3D mapping, hazard assessment, motion planning, and six-DOF control. These autonomy-enabling functions require a system-level executive ( Grasso, 2002 ; Verma et al, 2006 ; Fesq et al, 2019 ) to orchestrate these functions with the planning, execution, system health management, and data management, as was demonstrated in prior studies involving landings on the Moon and on small bodies ( Riedel et al, 2008 ; Riedel et al, 2010 ), and for understanding fundamental trade-offs concerning small-body touch-and-go sampling ( Cangahuala et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such capabilities include perception, feature tracking for motion estimation, 3D mapping, hazard assessment, motion planning, and six-DOF control. These autonomy-enabling functions require a system-level executive ( Grasso, 2002 ; Verma et al, 2006 ; Fesq et al, 2019 ) to orchestrate these functions with the planning, execution, system health management, and data management, as was demonstrated in prior studies involving landings on the Moon and on small bodies ( Riedel et al, 2008 ; Riedel et al, 2010 ), and for understanding fundamental trade-offs concerning small-body touch-and-go sampling ( Cangahuala et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming a maximum allowed inclination from the vertical equal to 15°and a 60°FoV for the camera, the maximum inclination at which an area can appear in the input image is 45°. The expected attitude estimation accuracy is far better than 1°, relying on star trackers and inertial measurement units (Riedel et al, 2010). Taking a 1 degree error as a worst case scenario, the corresponding maximum relative error in lengths estimation would be 3.55 %.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A highly flexible and generic pointing specification capability was designed and implemented for the first time on the Cassini spacecraft [17][18] in the Ada language, and largely re-implemented on Deep Space 1 in the C language, with many very substantial enhancements to enable AutoNav operation [19]. These missions took a traditional flight software approach to attitude specification and profile, and as such were relatively brittle and nonmalleable, except for that made possible by the rare -and generally labor intensive and traumatic -FSW updates.…”
Section: B Enabling Factors For a Modern Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%