“…Previous fluorescence microscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) studies clearly establish either physical or chemical changes separately during polymerization reactions as diverse as ROMP and Phillips alkene polymerization but have been limited in providing simultaneous chemical and physical measurements with high spatiotemporal resolution of both parameters. ,− For example, to date, SEM and TEM have informed on polymer morphology after reaction completion but are generally not suitable for in situ imaging of the polymerization reactions due to the need for high vacuum and dry materials. , Liquid cell TEM has recently enabled in situ imaging of polymerization reactions and other related processes (e.g., cross-linking, scission, self-assembly, and micelle formation) of polymer particles in solvents (typically water), by monitoring morphological changes that occur during the reaction. However, this emerging technique has notable shortcomings because the high-energy electron beam can induce changes to the polymers (scission/degradation), and the ability to image in solution and organic solvents is still limited. − AFM has measured the conformational changes of single polymer strands during reaction but has not provided spatial resolution or direct chemical measurement during an ongoing reaction. , Fluorescence microscopy measurements have reported either physical/chemical changes without concurrent measurement of the other or without spatial resolution (e.g., inspiring recent work by Wöll and Goldsmith ,, and separate prior work from our laboratory ,,, ).…”