2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9sc05559b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical monitoring of polymerizations in droplets with high temporal dynamic range

Abstract: Two complementary measurements, fluorescence polarization anisotropy and aggregation-induced emission, allow for in situ optical monitoring of polymerization reaction progress in droplets across varying temporal regimes of the reaction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous fluorescence microscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) studies clearly establish either physical or chemical changes separately during polymerization reactions as diverse as ROMP and Phillips alkene polymerization but have been limited in providing simultaneous chemical and physical measurements with high spatiotemporal resolution of both parameters. , For example, to date, SEM and TEM have informed on polymer morphology after reaction completion but are generally not suitable for in situ imaging of the polymerization reactions due to the need for high vacuum and dry materials. , Liquid cell TEM has recently enabled in situ imaging of polymerization reactions and other related processes (e.g., cross-linking, scission, self-assembly, and micelle formation) of polymer particles in solvents (typically water), by monitoring morphological changes that occur during the reaction. However, this emerging technique has notable shortcomings because the high-energy electron beam can induce changes to the polymers (scission/degradation), and the ability to image in solution and organic solvents is still limited. AFM has measured the conformational changes of single polymer strands during reaction but has not provided spatial resolution or direct chemical measurement during an ongoing reaction. , Fluorescence microscopy measurements have reported either physical/chemical changes without concurrent measurement of the other or without spatial resolution (e.g., inspiring recent work by Wöll and Goldsmith ,, and separate prior work from our laboratory ,,, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous fluorescence microscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) studies clearly establish either physical or chemical changes separately during polymerization reactions as diverse as ROMP and Phillips alkene polymerization but have been limited in providing simultaneous chemical and physical measurements with high spatiotemporal resolution of both parameters. , For example, to date, SEM and TEM have informed on polymer morphology after reaction completion but are generally not suitable for in situ imaging of the polymerization reactions due to the need for high vacuum and dry materials. , Liquid cell TEM has recently enabled in situ imaging of polymerization reactions and other related processes (e.g., cross-linking, scission, self-assembly, and micelle formation) of polymer particles in solvents (typically water), by monitoring morphological changes that occur during the reaction. However, this emerging technique has notable shortcomings because the high-energy electron beam can induce changes to the polymers (scission/degradation), and the ability to image in solution and organic solvents is still limited. AFM has measured the conformational changes of single polymer strands during reaction but has not provided spatial resolution or direct chemical measurement during an ongoing reaction. , Fluorescence microscopy measurements have reported either physical/chemical changes without concurrent measurement of the other or without spatial resolution (e.g., inspiring recent work by Wöll and Goldsmith ,, and separate prior work from our laboratory ,,, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…19−21 AFM has measured the conformational changes of single polymer strands during reaction but has not provided spatial resolution or direct chemical measurement during an ongoing reaction. 22,23 Fluorescence microscopy measurements have reported either physical/chemical changes without concurrent measurement of the other or without spatial resolution (e.g., inspiring recent work by Woll and Goldsmith 9,24,25 and separate prior work from our laboratory 6,13,15,26 ).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, bifurcation-based quantum annealing was proposed as an alternative to standard quantum annealing. [37][38][39][40] Adiabatic quantum computing and quantum annealing provide us with a method of solving for the Ising ground state, by evolving a system from the ground state of an accessible problem to that of a more difficult problem. 29,30,41 Although a molecular computer remains a classical device, unable to avail itself of quantum tunneling across barriers in the potential energy surface relating to the problem Hamiltonian, the rationale can still be extended to simulated annealing.…”
Section: Concept Optimization By Simulated Annealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also should be noted that the reaction geometry is analogous to surface-grafted polymer growths, except for the presence of the pulling force. This magnetic tweezers approach is part of the emerging efforts toward studying polymerization reactions of synthetic polymers at the single-molecule level. ,, Bayley et al have used single-nanopore electrical recording to monitor single poly­(disulfide)­s polymerization at single-monomer resolution, but the polymer growth was limited to ∼10 subunits by the nanopore size. , Using single-molecule fluorescence microscopy, Blum et al visualized the incorporation of single fluorescently labeled monomers into synthetic polymer aggregates amid a high concentration of unlabeled monomers, and Goldsmith et al have quantified the initiation kinetics of single organometallic catalysts for metathesis polymerization reactions …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%