1964
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.136.b637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical-Model Analysis of "Quasielastic" (p, n) Reactions

Abstract: Measured differential cross sections for (p,n) transitions between isobaric analog states are compared with the predictions of an optical model which includes an isobaric spin-dependent potential proportional to t-T 0 , where t and To are the isobaric spins of projectile and target, respectively. The magnitudes of the measured cross sections indicate a strength for this potential which is close to the symmetry potential found from analysis of elastic proton scattering. The shapes of the angular distributions g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the energies of the analog states are separated approximately by the Coulomb displacement energy, the charge-exchange scattering to the IAS has a nonzero Q value. To account for this effect, the double-folded FF (4) is evaluated at the energy of E = E lab − Q/2, midway between the energies of the incident 3 He and emergent triton, as suggested by Satchler et al [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the energies of the analog states are separated approximately by the Coulomb displacement energy, the charge-exchange scattering to the IAS has a nonzero Q value. To account for this effect, the double-folded FF (4) is evaluated at the energy of E = E lab − Q/2, midway between the energies of the incident 3 He and emergent triton, as suggested by Satchler et al [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the energies of isobar analog states are separated approximately by the Coulomb displacement energy, the (p, n) transition between them has a nonzero Q value. To account for this effect, the isoscalar U 0 and isovector U 1 potentials used to construct F pn (R) and U n (R) are evaluated at an effective incident energy of E = E lab − Q/2, midway between the energies of the incident proton and emergent neutron, as suggested by Satchler et al [1].…”
Section: A General Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarity of the initial and final states of the (p, n) reaction makes this reaction very much like an elastic scattering in which the isospin of the incident proton is "flipped." Indeed, the isospin-dependent part of the proton-nucleus optical potential (OP) was used by Satchler et al [1] some 40 years ago as the charge exchange form factor in their study of the (p, n) reaction within the distorted wave Born approximation (DWBA). In general, the central nucleon-nucleus OP can be written in terms of the isovector coupling [2] as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we are interested in collective contributions, we neglect the single-particle part of the operator in the nuclear matrix element. To this approximation we have In the collective model, neglecting the difference between the isoscalar deformation parameter Po and the mass deformation parameter, we may write the isovector operator as [27,28) For a harmonic vibrator, the first term of Eq. (C3) is zero.…”
Section: Appendix 8: Commutators and Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%