The possibility to reversibly photoisomerize azobenzene (AB) has made it one of the most ubiquitous light-sensitive molecular switches. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Opto-and nanomechanical devices [9,10] that convert light to mechanical action, for instance, exploit the considerable stretching of AB on Z!E isomerization. In biochemical studies, AB has been integrated into synthetic peptides and foldamers to photocontrol their conformational dynamics. [6,11] Photoaddressable materials such as image-storage media are often based on AB functional units. [12,7] For all of the above applications of the AB photoswitch it is of paramount importance to ensure that the photoisomerization process [13][14][15] is fast and has a high quantum yield.Recently, a greatly enhanced E!Z quantum yield F ABÀC 2 E!Z was reported for a bridged azobenzene (AB-C 2 in Figure 1) in the S 1 state compared to the parent molecule AB. [16] This finding may seem surprising at first, as the structural changes involved in isomerization are expected to be hindered by the restriction due to the presence of a bridge interconnecting the phenyl rings. It thus seems remarkable to observe a much larger quantum yield of bridged AB-C 2 compared to AB itself. Herein we demonstrate that, counterintuitively, the bridge does not hinder photoisomerization. On the contrary, it suitably preorients the phenyl rings such that AB-C 2 can more easily undergo E!Z isomerization, so that not only an enhanced quantum yield F ABÀC 2 E!Z but also ultrashort S 1 lifetimes result.Similar to earlier work [17][18][19] we investigated the photodynamics of E-AB-C 2 in the S 1 excited state in the gas phase employing nonadiabatic [20,21] ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD), [22] whereby "on-the-fly" nonadiabaticity is introduced by using Tullys fewest-switches surface hopping [23] to couple S 1 and S 0 . In particular, the fewest-switches method has been demonstrated [13][14][15] to describe satisfactorily, both mechanistically and quantitatively, photoisomerization of the parent compound AB, including the E!Z and Z!E quantum yields and the timescales involved. Here, all calculations were carried out with the CPMD package [24] by employing a cubic 18 periodic box, the PBE functional, and plane waves with dual-space pseudopotentials. [22] A total of 30 nonadiabatic simulations of at least 500 fs were performed microcanonically in the Born-Oppenheimer mode with a time step of 2 a.u., with initial conditions sampled from a canonical ground state run at 300 K.A prerequisite for the dynamics is an extensive validation of the S 0 and S 1 potential energy surfaces, which was done in much detail [18] for the parent compound by comparison with CASPT2 data. [17][18][19] An analogous analysis for the E-AB-C 2 derivative confirms that the DFT excitation energy (2.59 eV) is again in good agreement with both CASPT2 (2.52 eV) and experiment (2.53 eV). On chemical modification of AB to form AB-C 2 (i.e., addition of a À CH 2 CH 2 À bridge in ortho position of the phenyl rings) the E isomer b...