2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-012-0069-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical measurement of tars in a fluidized bed gasifier: influence of fuel type and gasification parameters on their formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, reliable methods with verified accuracies for measuring tars are needed, and these methods should include a tool for determining the error of measurement. Extensive studies have been carried out to develop ways of measuring the tar content of the product gas using both online and off-line methods. The two main off-line methods are (1) the tar protocol, which is a cold trapping method whereby the tar is collected in a series of cooled impinger bottles that contain a solvent, and (2) Solid-Phase Adsorption (SPA), in which tar is adsorbed onto a solid-phase extraction (spe) column containing an amino phase and subsequently desorbed using a solvent. While both methods allow for quantification of individual tar species, they differ with respect to the sampling procedure employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, reliable methods with verified accuracies for measuring tars are needed, and these methods should include a tool for determining the error of measurement. Extensive studies have been carried out to develop ways of measuring the tar content of the product gas using both online and off-line methods. The two main off-line methods are (1) the tar protocol, which is a cold trapping method whereby the tar is collected in a series of cooled impinger bottles that contain a solvent, and (2) Solid-Phase Adsorption (SPA), in which tar is adsorbed onto a solid-phase extraction (spe) column containing an amino phase and subsequently desorbed using a solvent. While both methods allow for quantification of individual tar species, they differ with respect to the sampling procedure employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… S.No. Chemical reactions Types of chemical reactions References 1 C +O 2 ⇄ CO 2 Oxidation Reaction [ 51 ] 2 H 2 +½O 2 ⇄H 2 O Oxidation Reaction [ 130 ] 3 CH 4 +H 2 O ⇄ 3H 2 +CO Steam reforming of hydrocarbons/Methane reforming [ 56 , 62 ] 4 C+CO 2 ⇄ 2CO Boudouard reaction [ 57 ] 5 CH 4 +CO 2 → 2H 2 +2CO Dry reforming of hydrocarbons/Carbon dioxide reforming [ 131 ] 6 C +H 2 O →H 2 +CO Char steam reforming/gasification [ 57 ] 7 C+2H 2 → CH 4 Carbon hydrogenation reaction/Methanation [ 96 , 97 ] 8 H 2 O+CO ⇄H 2 +CO 2 Water-gas shift reaction [ 98 ] …”
Section: Biohydrogen Production Through the Gasification Of Plastic Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At high pressures, a range of industrial grade gasifiers are operated for treating the plastic waste. Of all the gasification reactions, the only reactions which are greatly influenced by an increase in pressure are methanation and methane reforming [ 96 ]. Rising pressure makes the output gas methane-rich, and amounts of hydrogen and carbon monoxide are reduced [ 97 ].…”
Section: Biohydrogen Production Through the Gasification Of Plastic Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon in the gas phase is present either as permanent gas, which is typically monitored using an online instrument such as a micro-GC or NDIR instrument or as condensable species and tar. Tar compounds can be measured using several online methods, although the most commonly used methods are off-line, such as the tar protocol and the SPA method, both of which allow quantification of individual species. Online methods are typically faster, making them suitable for monitoring gasification processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%