Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2314117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical instrument design of the high-energy x-ray probe (HEX-P)

Abstract: The High-Energy X-ray Probe (HEX-P) is a probe-class next-generation high-energy X-ray mission concept that will vastly extend the reach of broadband X-ray observations. Studying the 2-200 keV energy range, HEX-P has 40 times the sensitivity of any previous mission in the 10-80 keV band, and will be the first focusing instrument in the 80-200 keV band. A successor to the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR), a NASA Small Explorer launched in 2012, HEX-P addresses key NASA science objectives, and will… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although unlikely to be detectable with current X-ray telescopes (e.g. XMM, NuSTAR, or NICER), our preliminary estimation indicates that they may possibly be within the reach of future high-sensitivity missions such as eXTP (Zhang et al 2016), STROBE-X (Ray et al 2018), and Athena (Nandra et al 2013) for the ∼ 4 keV line and HEX-P (Madsen et al 2018) for the ∼ 28 keV line.…”
Section: X-ray Confirmation Of Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although unlikely to be detectable with current X-ray telescopes (e.g. XMM, NuSTAR, or NICER), our preliminary estimation indicates that they may possibly be within the reach of future high-sensitivity missions such as eXTP (Zhang et al 2016), STROBE-X (Ray et al 2018), and Athena (Nandra et al 2013) for the ∼ 4 keV line and HEX-P (Madsen et al 2018) for the ∼ 28 keV line.…”
Section: X-ray Confirmation Of Candidatesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, proposed next generation balloon or satellite missions could achieve line sensitivities of ∼ 10 −8 -10 −6 γ cm −2 s −1 (see a summary in e.g., Fryer et al 2019). These include balloon missions such as COSI (Kierans et al 2016) and GRAMS (Aramaki et al 2019), as well as several satellite missions, e.g., AMEGO (Moiseev & Team 2018), e-ASTROGAM (Tavani et al 2018), ETCC (Tanimori et al 2017), HEX-P (Madsen et al 2018), and LOX (Miller et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the extent to which future missions can distinguish between the two main models proposed to explain the soft excess (i.e., warm corona or relativistic reflection), we utilize the fakeit task in XSPEC to generate simulated data of future missions by using Model B with the exact best-fit values, and use Model A to fit the fake data. We choose the Advanced Telescope for High-energy Astrophysics (Athena, Nandra et al 2013), the enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry mission (eXTP, Zhang et al 2017), and the High-Energy X-ray Probe (HEX-P, Madsen et al 2018). The X-ray Integral Field Unit (X-IFU, Barret et al 2016) instrument on Athena has an effective energy range of 0.2-12 keV with 2.5 eV spectral resolution, satisfying our requirement to make a distinction.…”
Section: Simulations Of the Future Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will enable more straightforward comparison between coronae of obscured and unobscured AGNs, their physical properties, and possibly scaling relations and evolution (e.g., Kammoun et al 2017;Lanzuisi et al 2019). More similar studies are expected in the future based on NuSTAR data, though higher-sensitivity and higher-energy coverage of the proposed missions HEX-P (Madsen et al 2018(Madsen et al , 2019 or FORCE (Nakazawa et al 2018) will be needed in order to reach large AGN samples and detailed coronal physics (Kamraj et al 2019 We have made use of data from the NuSTAR mission, a project led by the California Institute of Technology, managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We thank the NuSTAR Operations, Software and Calibration teams for support with the execution and analysis of these observations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%