1978
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-197808000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Image Quality in the Peripheral Retina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calibration results strongly indicated that the pupil foreshortening error is invariant across changes in pupil size and systematically varies as a function of the orientation of the eye with respect to the camera. The results corresponded well with previous empirical measurements of pupil foreshortening error in biological human eyes (Mathur, Gehrmann, & Atchison, 2013;Jennings & Charman, 1978;Jay, 1962;Spring & Stiles, 1948). Together, these findings suggest the geometric correction can be used to virtually eliminate pupil foreshortening error.…”
Section: Pupil Data Preprocessingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The calibration results strongly indicated that the pupil foreshortening error is invariant across changes in pupil size and systematically varies as a function of the orientation of the eye with respect to the camera. The results corresponded well with previous empirical measurements of pupil foreshortening error in biological human eyes (Mathur, Gehrmann, & Atchison, 2013;Jennings & Charman, 1978;Jay, 1962;Spring & Stiles, 1948). Together, these findings suggest the geometric correction can be used to virtually eliminate pupil foreshortening error.…”
Section: Pupil Data Preprocessingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The Nyquist limit is determined by the spacing of the individual sampling units in the retina. Comparing anatomical and optical resolution limits, Jennings and Charman [13,14] and Williams et al [39] conclude that neither in the center nor in the periphery are the limitations imposed by the optical system; rather, they are imposed by photoreceptor sampling. The authors suggested that optical blur has little effect on peripheral visual acuity but rather helps to reduce aliasing [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If different segments of the cornea have different refractive indices, the pupil diameter can appear to change when the eye rotates, turning different segments towards the camera. There are empirical data that bear on this issue (e.g., Spring & Stiles, 1948; Jay, 1962; Jennings & Charman, 1978). These studies photograph human eyes from a range of oblique angles, fit ellipses to the pupil images, and estimate the foreshortening coefficient as a function of the angle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the data of Mathur et al (2013), as well as the earlier data re-analyzed therein (Spring and Stiles, 1948, etc. Jay, 1962; Jennings & Charman, 1978), were all collected along the horizontal equatorial line. One area for future research would be to systematically map the apparent pupil foreshortening across the entire visual field in participants with dilated eyes, and compare the human eye data to our artificial eye data to quantify the effect of corneal refraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%