2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00103-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical grating coupler biosensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
156
1
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 386 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
156
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that, during the sensing process, the response of the interferometer remains in the linear range. In addition, as pointed out in [6], in first approximation the effective refractive index change of the adlayer is proportional to the change of the adsorbed mass, and to bulk concentration of the analyte. Hence, the initial slope of the signal detected by our interferometric sensor should be proportional to the bulk concentration of the bacteria to be detected.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 90%
“…This implies that, during the sensing process, the response of the interferometer remains in the linear range. In addition, as pointed out in [6], in first approximation the effective refractive index change of the adlayer is proportional to the change of the adsorbed mass, and to bulk concentration of the analyte. Hence, the initial slope of the signal detected by our interferometric sensor should be proportional to the bulk concentration of the bacteria to be detected.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 90%
“…The said effects bring about the change of effective refrac− tive indexes of modes propagating in the structure. The changes of effective refractive indexes can be measured by the application of the interferometers of Mach−Zehnder [5][6][7], Young [8,9], Michelson [10] and with a polarimeter [2,11,12] or grating couplers [3,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Due to technologi− cal constraints (the interaction length is limited to single centimetres), the operating range in PEWS is most fre− quently limited to a single interference fringe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to validate the exact spatial location of immobilised protein and the immobilised quantity thereof on a surface is important and techniques such as surface plasmon resonance [17,18], ellipsometry [19], optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy [20], and quartz crystal microbalance [21] have been previously reported. These techniques quantitatively measure the amount of protein immobilised on flat, planar surfaces such as glass, gold, and plastic substrates, but these methods cannot easily be utilised for macroporous monolithic materials, because of the huge disparity between the surface area of a monolith compared with a flat surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%