2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11468-015-9890-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Forces on Silver Homogeneous Nanotubes: Study of Shell Plasmonic Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept that force calculated by contour type C 1 is associated with to radiationʼs pressure exerted on the particle has to be abandoned in this case. While in the case of homogeneous shell we found that forces calculated by C 1 coincided perfectly with forces calculated by far field approach of radiationʼs pressure (see equation (2) on the work [4]), in case of inhomogeneous shell this is no longer true. In section 4 this statement will remain clear.…”
Section: Methodology and Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The concept that force calculated by contour type C 1 is associated with to radiationʼs pressure exerted on the particle has to be abandoned in this case. While in the case of homogeneous shell we found that forces calculated by C 1 coincided perfectly with forces calculated by far field approach of radiationʼs pressure (see equation (2) on the work [4]), in case of inhomogeneous shell this is no longer true. In section 4 this statement will remain clear.…”
Section: Methodology and Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The results of figure 3 are a proof that curves α, obtained by integration of the Maxwellʼs stress tensor, (4), contain information about the complete interaction in the structure and not only would give us an expression for radiationʼs pressure [4,9], as one primarily may think. The radiationʼs pressure that one could expect is more related to the corresponding curves for j =  90, 270 } on this figure are identical, is directly related to the results (for nearfields) showed in figures 7(c) and 7(d) on [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations