1997
DOI: 10.1021/ac960983b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Detection of Chloramphenicol Using Molecularly Imprinted Polymers

Abstract: A practical optical sensing system for the determination of chloramphenicol (CAP), utilizing molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) and HPLC, has been developed. The method is based on competitive displacement of a chloramphenicol-methyl red (CAP-MR) dye conjugate from specific binding cavities in an imprinted polymer by the analyte. The best of these polymers was obtained using (diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate as functional monomer at a monomer:template ratio of 2:1. HPLC with a mobile phase containing CAP-MR … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
54
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The recommended methods in pharmacopoeias for determining CAP in pharmaceuticals involve UV-spectroscopy and HPLC, but have limited selectivity and ore often subjected to interferences from components of the matrix [14,15]. Currently used methods for the determination of CAP in animal food samples, milk, meat or tissues and fluids of treated cattle include GC [16][17][18][19], HPLC [20][21][22][23], and planar chromatography [24]. However, these methods are laborious and require high cost instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommended methods in pharmacopoeias for determining CAP in pharmaceuticals involve UV-spectroscopy and HPLC, but have limited selectivity and ore often subjected to interferences from components of the matrix [14,15]. Currently used methods for the determination of CAP in animal food samples, milk, meat or tissues and fluids of treated cattle include GC [16][17][18][19], HPLC [20][21][22][23], and planar chromatography [24]. However, these methods are laborious and require high cost instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, it is difficult to find materials demonstrating recognition properties comparable to biological receptors [5]. Besides, the application of biosensors in practice was greatly restricted by the instability of biomaterials and operation in harsh chemical environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other is the difficulty of electrical communication between recognition sites and the transducer caused by highly cross-linked polymers. Not surprising, most of the evaluations of molecular recognition are conducted either by QCM [11], chromogenic makers [12] or by optical methods [13]. Molecularly imprinted monolayers and thin-film assemblies, however, present a possible way to eliminate the diffusion barriers for the analytes and improve the electrical communication between recognition sites and transducer [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%