2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical cues used in predation by jumping spiders, Phidippus audax (Araneae, Salticidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We think that this active and prolonged scanning behavior is fundamental for the process of learning novel visual stimuli, as well as in novel detours. In the study by Bednarski et al (2012), described in the introduction, the spiders had no possibility of engaging in this visual inspection, given the fact that the stimuli were moving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We think that this active and prolonged scanning behavior is fundamental for the process of learning novel visual stimuli, as well as in novel detours. In the study by Bednarski et al (2012), described in the introduction, the spiders had no possibility of engaging in this visual inspection, given the fact that the stimuli were moving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested Phidippus regius (Koch, 1846), a species belonging to the family of Salticidae that has been successfully tested through a variety of methodologies, such as conditioning (Jakob, Skow, Haberman, & Plourde, 2007;Liedtke & Schneider, 2014;Peckmezian & Taylor, 2015a), using simulated environments (Peckmezian & Taylor, 2015b) and even using neurophysiological recording techniques (Menda, Shamble, Nitzany, Golden, & Hoy, 2014). A previous study (Bednarski, Taylor, & Jakob, 2012) tested the ability of jumping spiders to discriminate between the moving image of a cricket (meaningful) and a moving rectangle (abstract), but the animals seemed unable to learn to discriminate between the two. However, the focus of the experiment was the detection of the motion of stimuli, rather than their shape.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiment demonstrates that vibration provides an alternative to another proven aversive stimulus, shock (e.g., Skow 2007;Bednarski et al 2012). Shock has several drawbacks that vibration does not share.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, caution is needed before accepting null hypotheses and we are reluctant to suggest, on the basis of non-significant findings, that C. gibbosus and P. wanlessi are simply incapable of solving novel problems by trial and error or that these two species have no capacity for operant conditioning. There has been longstanding interest in determining the capacity that insects and spiders express for various categories of learning (Dukas 2008; Bednarski et al 2012; Liedtke and Schneider 2014), including operant conditioning (Skinner 1938), and we expect operant conditioning to be within the capacity of almost any insect or spider.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%