2015
DOI: 10.2138/am-2015-4824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical constants of synthetic potassium, sodium, and hydronium jarosite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The real indices of refraction can vary over the wavelength range (0.8 μm-2.5 μm) used in this study, but we adopt constant values of n = 1.51 for gypsum and n = 1.52 for montmorillonite, which are averages based on estimates from Roush (2005 ) and Roush et al (2007 ). This is in contrast to the wavelength-dependent Kramers-Kronig solutions for n used in other studies ( Roush, 2005;Roush et al, 2007;Sklute et al, 2015 ), which find that n may vary by up to 0.03 (e.g., Roush et al, 2007 ). However, for this study we make the assumptions that such differences are negligible and adopt a constant value over the wavelength range of interest.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The real indices of refraction can vary over the wavelength range (0.8 μm-2.5 μm) used in this study, but we adopt constant values of n = 1.51 for gypsum and n = 1.52 for montmorillonite, which are averages based on estimates from Roush (2005 ) and Roush et al (2007 ). This is in contrast to the wavelength-dependent Kramers-Kronig solutions for n used in other studies ( Roush, 2005;Roush et al, 2007;Sklute et al, 2015 ), which find that n may vary by up to 0.03 (e.g., Roush et al, 2007 ). However, for this study we make the assumptions that such differences are negligible and adopt a constant value over the wavelength range of interest.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that our implementation of the Hapke model is largely similar to that of Roush et al (2007) and Sklute et al (2015) , with the exception that we estimate the phase function by using fixed values for the Legendre polynomial coefficients ( b = -0.4 and c = 0.25, based on values for silicates from Mustard and Pieters (1989) and consistent with moderate forward scattering). As a test of the sensitivity to these values, we varied the b and c parameters by 0.3 and found that it changed the single scattering albedo values by only 1% (relative) and ultimately had a negligible effect on the modeling results.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The single‐scattering albedo is dependent on grain size and the optical constants (the real and imaginary indices of refraction n and k ), which define a mineral's optical properties. To make the spectral library of the single‐scattering albedos, mineral optical constants were first obtained using the Shkuratov radiative transfer model [ Shkuratov et al ., ; Martone and Glotch , ] or the Hapke radiative transfer model [ Sklute et al ., ]. Single‐scattering albedos were then calculated based on the Hapke model for a given grain size using the following equation: w=Se+()1Se()1SinormalΘ1SinormalΘ where S e is the reflectivity for the external incident light and is a function of both n and k : Se=n12+k2n12+k2+0.05 and S i is the reflectivity for the internal incident light and is expressed as Si=1.0144nn+12 …”
Section: Data Sets and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%