1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf00608110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical constants of petroleum samples in the 0.25?25 ? range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the lower wavelength λ = 3.4 µm, the differences between a heavy and a light oil is not significant, making the oil characterization impossible. By contrast, for λ = 10 µm, differences between the two oil types appear for either low or high observation an- [6] with the salinity adjustment from Friedman [7]), and the oil [8,9] gles θ. Thus, this highlights the possibility of characterizing different oil types at this typical wavelength, which can be useful to determine the origin of an oil pollution.…”
Section: Infrared Emissivity Of Clean and Contaminated Seasmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the lower wavelength λ = 3.4 µm, the differences between a heavy and a light oil is not significant, making the oil characterization impossible. By contrast, for λ = 10 µm, differences between the two oil types appear for either low or high observation an- [6] with the salinity adjustment from Friedman [7]), and the oil [8,9] gles θ. Thus, this highlights the possibility of characterizing different oil types at this typical wavelength, which can be useful to determine the origin of an oil pollution.…”
Section: Infrared Emissivity Of Clean and Contaminated Seasmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This implies that the whole oil film problem can be treated from the single air/oil surface problem, by substituting the Fresnel reflection coefficient of air/oil single interface for the equivalent Fresnel reflection coefficient of the air/oil/sea film. The calculations are led for IR wavelengths, inside the two windows regions 3 − 5 µm and 8 − 13 µm at the wavelengths 3.4 µm and 10 µm, for which the refractive indexes of the sea water (taken from the refractive index of pure water by Hale and Querry [6] with the salinity adjustment from Friedman [7]) and the oil [8,9] are given in Table 1. Since under the GOA, the emissivity depends on the slope PDF (Probability Density Function), the RMS slope along the wind direction of a contaminated sea surface must be calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies exist in literature about the effect of certain types of crude oil on the refractive index of pure water at visible wavelengths, indicating that most emulsions can easily exhibit values up to 1.5 or even higher (Król et al, 2006;Otremba, 2000;Otremba & Piskozub, 2003). Unfortunately, data in the SWIR are scarce and somewhat dated, but seem to indicate that also in this spectral region a similar increase can be expected (Al'perovich et al, 1978;den Boer et al, 1995). A possible reason for the lack of data in the SWIR is the difficulty in resolving oscillations of the real part of the refractive index in regions with strong absorption features (as predicted by the Kramers-Kronig dispersion relations), and reflectance spectra of the Deepwater oil indeed show alkane absorption in the SWIR region (Clark et al, 2010).…”
Section: Sensitivity Studymentioning
confidence: 97%