1986
DOI: 10.1364/ao.25.001604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical computing and the Fredkin gates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work using MZIs: Optical logic design using crossbar routing devices has been investigated in literature. Shamir, Caulfield, et al and others investigated the use of optical crossbar gates as Fredkin gates [11] [12]. The Fredkin gate model assumes that an optical input can also drive the switching input of a gate, allowing the gate to be used in a reversible logic role, but precluding its applicability to our device model.…”
Section: Background and Device Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work using MZIs: Optical logic design using crossbar routing devices has been investigated in literature. Shamir, Caulfield, et al and others investigated the use of optical crossbar gates as Fredkin gates [11] [12]. The Fredkin gate model assumes that an optical input can also drive the switching input of a gate, allowing the gate to be used in a reversible logic role, but precluding its applicability to our device model.…”
Section: Background and Device Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ourselves noted that lossy conservative logic gates were still interesting [11] and that certain parallel operations could be done quantum mechanically using coherent optics [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Optical Vector Logic As Quantum Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A photorefractive gate based on four-wave mixing is an all-optical approach mentioned by the authors in [56]. Besides the two incident input message beams, the control consists of two pump beams.…”
Section: Photorefractive Gate Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this approach differs significantly from the polarization switching gate discussed by Shamir et al [56]. In that gate, signals passing through a electrooptic modulator are rotated I by 90' when the gate is activated electrically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%