2009
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181aaea32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical coherence tomography is less sensitive than visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis

Abstract: Objectives: Determine the utility of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to detect clinical and subclinical remote optic neuritis (ON), its relationship to clinical characteristics of ON and visual function, and whether the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness functions as a surrogate marker of global disease severity. Methods:Cross-sectional study of 65 subjects with at least 1 clinical ON episode at least 6 months prior. Measures included clinical characteristics, visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
88
2
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
12
88
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because demyelination alone does not cause optic atrophy, we believe OCT was the best method with which to associate atrophy as they represent axonal loss. 28 Despite these limitations, our results add to the growing literature suggesting that OCT may allow for earlier detection of MS axonal loss in the visual pathway as measured by RNFL defects. Our study also supports the utility of OCT as a structural marker of axonal loss in clinical trials of neuroprotective drugs, and suggests a future clinical role.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, because demyelination alone does not cause optic atrophy, we believe OCT was the best method with which to associate atrophy as they represent axonal loss. 28 Despite these limitations, our results add to the growing literature suggesting that OCT may allow for earlier detection of MS axonal loss in the visual pathway as measured by RNFL defects. Our study also supports the utility of OCT as a structural marker of axonal loss in clinical trials of neuroprotective drugs, and suggests a future clinical role.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Naismith et al [66] systematically evaluated the utility of OCT and VEPs to detect the presence of clinical and subclinical ON and examined the relation of these measures to visual function. This retrospective, crosssectional study evaluated 65 subjects (n=96 eyes) with MS (n=40), clinically isolated syndrome (n =1), neuromyelitis optica (NMO, n=20), and idiopathic demyelination (n=4).…”
Section: Role For Oct In Modeling Axonal and Neuronal Loss In Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 In conclusion, ON might be present in subclinical (occult) form without typical symptoms or complains. 32,33 Our patients did not have any complaints, especially visual, during the follow-up period and had not been examined by OCT or another technique for early detection of subclinical optic neuritis in the inter-observational period. For these reasons, we think that RNFL in some of the patients might tend to thicken, which is related to possible subclinical optic neuritis, and thus did not significantly decrease in the follow-up period, whereas RNFL thickness in healthy subject gradually reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%