2022
DOI: 10.33963/kp.a2022.0100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in a myocardial infarction patient. One more argument for a wider use of now reimbursed optical coherence tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, comparing the safety and effectiveness of available CAAE treatment methods in individual patient subgroups will allow individualization of treatment, including anticoagulant therapy. The analyses will be performed for the overall study population and in subgroups of patients with giant CAAEs, isolated CAAEs of the left main coronary artery, a positive family history of CAAEs, other associated coronary artery anomalies, and aneurysms in other locations [15].…”
Section: Expected Benefits and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, comparing the safety and effectiveness of available CAAE treatment methods in individual patient subgroups will allow individualization of treatment, including anticoagulant therapy. The analyses will be performed for the overall study population and in subgroups of patients with giant CAAEs, isolated CAAEs of the left main coronary artery, a positive family history of CAAEs, other associated coronary artery anomalies, and aneurysms in other locations [15].…”
Section: Expected Benefits and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, novel advanced imaging techniques of the coronary arteries and myocardial tissue, including highly sophisticated cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) modalities, became available. This allowed for a precise assessment of the impact of thrombus burden reduction on infarct size, scarring and LV remodelling [ 12 , 13 ]. Although echocardiography is a faster, cheaper and easily accessible method of left ventricle function assessment, CMR is a significantly more precise and sensitive tool, enabling the assessment of parameters such as MVO or scar retraction which are unavailable in echocardiography [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%