2015
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000472324.43630.b1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Coherence Tomography Can Detect Intracranial Hypertension in Young Children with Craniosynostosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there has been great historical interest in non-invasive modalities for assessing the presence or absence of IH. Options that have been utilized, with varying degrees of success and uptake, include fundoscopy [6], visual electrodiagnostic tests [7], optical coherence tomography [8], and optic nerve sheath ultrasound [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there has been great historical interest in non-invasive modalities for assessing the presence or absence of IH. Options that have been utilized, with varying degrees of success and uptake, include fundoscopy [6], visual electrodiagnostic tests [7], optical coherence tomography [8], and optic nerve sheath ultrasound [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classic symptoms of elevated ICP such as headache, behavioral changes, or vomiting are unreliable, particularly among infants and children,19,20 and intradural measurement is invasive. Alternatively, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the optic nerve demonstrates features associated with elevated ICP and has shown high sensitivity and specificity among patients with craniosynostosis 19–23…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the optic nerve demonstrates features associated with elevated ICP and has shown high sensitivity and specificity among patients with craniosynostosis. [19][20][21][22][23] Examination of the relationship between neurocognitive deficits and phenotypic severity in patients with metopic craniosynostosis has yielded mixed findings, with a lack of conclusive evidence in either direction. 5,12,[24][25][26][27] This inconsistency in findings is in part attributable to methodological variation in metopic severity and intelligence measures, precluding direct comparison of results across investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%