Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Quality Across Three Multicenter Clinical Studies of Diabetic Retinopathy

Abstract

Purpose To explore optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) quality and associated factors in multicenter clinical studies. Methods OCTA scans were obtained from participants with diabetic retinopathy from three DRCR Retina Network clinical studies using the Optovue AngioVue and ZEISS AngioPlex. Macular (3 × 3 mm and 6 × 6 mm) and optic nerve scans were captured. Quality was assessed by the Casey Reading Center. Scans were considered “poor” if the signal strength index (SSI) was less than 55 (AngioVue) or 7 (AngioPlex) or if excess motion, media opacities, beam defocus, incorrect axial position, or other artifacts were present. Results Included were 7539 scans from 787 eyes (461 participants). Sixty-one percent of scans were considered “good” (n = 4630). Of the 3 × 3-mm (n = 2294), 6 × 6-mm (n = 2705), and optic nerve scans (n = 2540), 62%, 63%, and 59%, respectively, were good. Differences in percentage of good scans by machine were not identified (61% of 6216 for the AngioVue and 63% of 1323 for the AngioPlex). The primary reason for poor scans was low SSI for the AngioVue (67%) and excess motion for the AngioPlex (47%). Good scans were associated with younger age (60 ± 12 years vs. 65 ± 11 years; P < 0.001), male gender (64% of males had good scans vs. 57% female; P = 0.007), and better visual acuity (ETDRS letter score 86.5 ± 6.4 [approximate Snellen equivalent 20/20] vs. 81.6 ± 9.7 [approximate Snellen equivalent 20/25]; P < 0.001). Conclusions Scan quality or analysis must be improved for OCTA metrics to be used as outcomes in future research. Translational Relevance Clinicians and researchers should be aware that poor SSI and artifacts are common issues for OCTA images.

Long-Term Variations in Retinal Parameters after Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery

“…The issue of image quality is especially important for OCTA evaluation, as OCTA is burdened with the problem of artifacts. Most reports confirmed the impact of poorer-quality OCTA scans on the measurement of vascular parameters, especially for repeated measurements [ 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Some authors directly recommend OCTA scan quality as high as 9/10 for comparative analysis [ 37 ].…”

Standardization of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Retinal Disease

“…This will provide image reproducibility, will make validation of diagnosis and treatment outcomes possible, and will make monitoring of changes over time more reliable and uniform. Image quality control mechanisms are also necessary for the effective use of OCT-A in DR evaluation and multicenter clinical trials [105]. Greig, Duker, and Waheed [106] offered a guide for a more effective OCT-A image analysis by assessing the (1) en face OCT-A image, (2) corresponding B-scans with vessel flow overlay, and (3) structural en face image for each retinal slab using a step-by-step method.…”

Developments in Non-Invasive Imaging to Guide Diagnosis and Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review

“…Large-scale observational studies offer the opportunity to explore the utility of novel non-invasive imaging modalities. A number of currently running clinical trials have included exploratory analyses with wide-field OCT, OCTA and colour fundus photography and we await the results with interest [74][75][76]. In a recent multicentre, head-to-head, real-world validation study of seven automated AI DR screening systems, the algorithms showed significant performance differences; for example, one system missed 25% of cases of PDR.…”