2019
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical coherence tomography: a window to the optic nerve in clinically isolated syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23 Second, optic nerve involvement on MRI may have different implications, compared with clinically manifest optic neuritis. 24,25 Importantly, these results do not seem to be affected by selection bias, given that only one patient (out of 10) with MRI optic nerve involvement but asymptomatic for optic neuritis experienced clinically manifest optic neuritis as the first relapse. 26 Finally, optic nerve involvement on MRI at the time of diagnosis may be associated with a shorter asymptomatic period, because the lesion is usually clinically manifest, and earliest phases of disease have been associated with a higher clinical activity in pediatric patients with MS. 6 The exposure to high-efficacy DMT was the only independent predictor of longer time to first relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…22,23 Second, optic nerve involvement on MRI may have different implications, compared with clinically manifest optic neuritis. 24,25 Importantly, these results do not seem to be affected by selection bias, given that only one patient (out of 10) with MRI optic nerve involvement but asymptomatic for optic neuritis experienced clinically manifest optic neuritis as the first relapse. 26 Finally, optic nerve involvement on MRI at the time of diagnosis may be associated with a shorter asymptomatic period, because the lesion is usually clinically manifest, and earliest phases of disease have been associated with a higher clinical activity in pediatric patients with MS. 6 The exposure to high-efficacy DMT was the only independent predictor of longer time to first relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Although SCA was obtained from three-dimensional brain MRI instead of dedicated SC acquisitions, previous work has shown that this is a valid alternative [28]. Although previous ON history was carefully taken into account in the statistical approach, asymptomatic optic nerve lesions frequently occur in patients with MS that could potentially modulate any of the associations with OCT-derived measures and could therefore be considered as a limitation of our study (as well as other previous OCT/MRI studies) [29,30]. Also, as visual function is included in the EDSS score we cannot exclude that the associations observed between pRNFL thickness and EDSS score may be partly explained by OCT measures pRNFL r p = À0.289; P = 0.007 r p = À0.375; P < 0.001 r p = À0.384; P < 0.001 r p = 0.014; P = 0.896 r p = À0.025; P = 0.822 GCIPL r p = À0.279; P = 0.023 r p = À0.304; P = 0.013 r p = À0.352; P = 0.004 r p = 0.084; P = 0.505 r p = À0.159; P = 0.201 INL r p = À0.028; P = 0.825 r p = 0.082; P = 0.513 r p = 0.085; P = 0.499 r p = 0.022; P = 0.862 r p = 0.109; P = 0.382 MRI measures BPF r p = À0.480; P < 0.001 r p = À0.571; P < 0.001 r p = À0.467; P < 0.001 r p = 0.190; P = 0.118 r p = À0.152; P = 0.188 GMF r p = À0.560; P < 0.001 r p = À0.406; P < 0.001 r p = À0.369; P = 0.001 r p = 0.217; P = 0.058 r p = À0.359; P = 0.001 WMF r p = 0.262; P = 0.022 r p = À0.015; P = 0.899 r p = 0.034; P = 0.772 r p = À0.107; P = 0.356 r p = 0.311; P = 0.006 SCA r p = À0.072; P = 0.535 r p = À0.354; P = 0.002 r p = À0.323; P = 0.004 r p = 0.064; P = 0.581 r p = 0.391; P < 0.001 Lesion volume r p = 0.386; P = 0.001 r p = 0.514; P < 0.001 r p = 0.385; P = 0.001 r p = À0.107; P = 0.353 r p = 0.270; P = 0.018…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although SCA was obtained from three‐dimensional brain MRI instead of dedicated SC acquisitions, previous work has shown that this is a valid alternative [28]. Although previous ON history was carefully taken into account in the statistical approach, asymptomatic optic nerve lesions frequently occur in patients with MS that could potentially modulate any of the associations with OCT‐derived measures and could therefore be considered as a limitation of our study (as well as other previous OCT/MRI studies) [29,30]. Also, as visual function is included in the EDSS score we cannot exclude that the associations observed between pRNFL thickness and EDSS score may be partly explained by asymptomatic optic nerve lesions and/or lesion within the optic radiations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we examined NPC1-P, clinically asymptomatic NPC1-MC, and HC using OCT to identify retinal degeneration and to evaluate the potential eligibility of OCT measures as biomarkers of neurodegeneration and disease progress. OCT proved to be a precise and reproducible method [27] for non-invasive visualization and quantification of retinal layers, and plays a crucial role in analyzing retinal changes in various neurodegenerative [15] and neuroinflammatory diseases [28][29][30]. Due to its anatomical, embryological, and physiological similarities with the brain, the retina offers a unique and easily accessible "window" to study correlates and consequences of subclinical pathology in the brain [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%