2021
DOI: 10.3390/sym13030517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical-Cavity-Induced Current

Abstract: The formation of a submicron optical cavity on one side of a metal–insulator–metal (MIM) tunneling device induces a measurable electrical current between the two metal layers with no applied voltage. Reducing the cavity thickness increases the measured current. Eight types of tests were carried out to determine whether the output could be due to experimental artifacts. All gave negative results, supporting the conclusion that the observed electrical output is genuinely produced by the device. We interpret the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears that our lab has, in fact, discovered and demonstrated a way to tap ZPE (Moddel et al 2021a;Moddel, 2021c). In this article, I review how we have done this and describe the underlying issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It appears that our lab has, in fact, discovered and demonstrated a way to tap ZPE (Moddel et al 2021a;Moddel, 2021c). In this article, I review how we have done this and describe the underlying issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[ 25,26 ] To this end, the conceived nanorectenna consists of a fully integrated antenna‐rectifier system. Following an asymmetric architecture, both from a geometrical [ 27–29 ] and material [ 30 ] point of view (see Figure 1 a and b, respectively), the nanorectenna is defined by a point‐contact Metal1‐Insulator‐Metal2 tunneling diode [ 31 ] (hereafter pc‐M1IM2) where the pc‐M1 component also plays the role of receiving plasmonic nano‐antenna. In particular, we considered an Au‐coated nanocone (pc‐M1) and a flat 50 nm thick Ti substrate (M2) as the nanorectenna electrodes due to the significant difference in their work functions ϕ, [ 32 ] with ϕ M1 = 5.10 eV and ϕ M2 = 4.33 eV, respectively (see Figure 1b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the evanescent fields in structure) along with predictions for the perturbed vacuum state within the cavity gaps. An additional benefit of the worldline numerics method 3 for studying the Casimir effect is that it can be used to address any type of geometry with effectively no restrictions on curvature or lack of smoothness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently published paper[3] details an experimental campaign using an asymmetric Casimir cavity arrangement where one cavity has a small separation and the other cavity has a much larger effective separation. This experimental campaign observed a current flow from the larger cavity electrode to the smaller cavity electrode.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%