2016
DOI: 10.1038/nature16528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical attosecond pulses and tracking the nonlinear response of bound electrons

Abstract: The time it takes a bound electron to respond to the electromagnetic force of light sets a fundamental speed limit on the dynamic control of matter and electromagnetic signal processing. Time-integrated measurements of the nonlinear refractive index of matter indicate that the nonlinear response of bound electrons to optical fields is not instantaneous; however, a complete spectral characterization of the nonlinear susceptibility tensors--which is essential to deduce the temporal response of a medium to arbitr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
290
0
37

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 408 publications
(333 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
290
0
37
Order By: Relevance
“…A customized set of UV DMs was produced. Their implementation allowed post compression down to 6.5 fs [22] corresponding well to the theoretical estimation of 6.9 fs, shown in Fig. 3, for initial design.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A customized set of UV DMs was produced. Their implementation allowed post compression down to 6.5 fs [22] corresponding well to the theoretical estimation of 6.9 fs, shown in Fig. 3, for initial design.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Here we present broadband highly dispersive mirrors designed for the central wavelength of 325 nm, that were successfully implemented for post compression of the UV pulse down to ∼7 fs [22]. By tuning the structure of the multilayer stack, we managed to significantly suppress the linear and nonlinear absorbance [23] and reach the overall reflectance of 94% and the total compressor efficiency of ≥ 50% in straight forward set up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polarization, as a function of time, becomes ever slightly retarded with respect to the driving wave, with a delay given by a textbook argument based on the ionization potential. This was only recently verified in an experiment [26], showing a delay on the order of a hundred attoseconds. Such a small value is negligible for the present purposes.…”
Section: Mesa Modelmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Over 5 orders of magnitude of variation of the input intensity caused a non-linear change in detector timing delay of more than 500 ps between the various components of the ranging system, the optical echo detection process also contributes to the error budget. The response of a bound electron to the electromagnetic force of light is fast but not instantaneous (Hassan et al 2016). While the resultant delay is on the sub-fs timescale in the interaction of electrons to light, the macroscopic response, namely the time delay between the arrival of a short light pulse and the appearance of the electrical output voltage on a fast linear detector is already of the order of 211 ps and for a high bandwidth photon counting device this builds up to about 1.745 ns ), leading to a large gap with significant uncertainty between the moment of arrival of an optical signal at the detector and the actual electrical timing output response.…”
Section: Delays From the Conversion From The Optical To The Electricamentioning
confidence: 99%