2013
DOI: 10.1364/ao.52.002974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical analysis of deviations in a concentrating photovoltaics central receiver system with a flux homogenizer

Abstract: The application of a kaleidoscope as a flux homogenizer to a concentrating photovoltaics system with a central receiver is investigated. The optical setup of a primary dish-type concentrator, a secondary homogenizer optics, and a photovoltaic receiver is simulated using ray tracing. The influence of various deviations from the ideal-namely sunshape (circumsolar radiation), shading, tracking error, and shape of the primary optical concentrator-on the performance of the homogenizer is analyzed quantitatively usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear coefficients of thermal and electrical outputs were obtained from multi-linear regression on measured data, which is similar to the quasi-dynamic method EN 12975-2: 2006 applied for solar thermal collectors. The influences of solar circumsolar ratio, shading, tracking error, deviations in the shape of the parabolic surface, and the homogenizer length were simulated using the ray-tracing method [184]. It was demonstrated that if sufficient length is provided, a kaleidoscope homogenizer compensates well for non-ideality factors of the primary concentrator.…”
Section: Parabolic/spherical Dish Concentratormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear coefficients of thermal and electrical outputs were obtained from multi-linear regression on measured data, which is similar to the quasi-dynamic method EN 12975-2: 2006 applied for solar thermal collectors. The influences of solar circumsolar ratio, shading, tracking error, deviations in the shape of the parabolic surface, and the homogenizer length were simulated using the ray-tracing method [184]. It was demonstrated that if sufficient length is provided, a kaleidoscope homogenizer compensates well for non-ideality factors of the primary concentrator.…”
Section: Parabolic/spherical Dish Concentratormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several homogeniser configurations are well documented in the CPV field. For instance, prism-based, working on the principle of total internal reflection [10]; mirror-based, working on multiple reflections using several mirrored facets [9,[11][12][13]; or those that are lens-based, such as the Köhler homogeniser [14], or domed homogenisers, as in [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 Consequently, secondary optical elements, such as homogenizers, are employed to improve the homogeneity of the round focused flux that results from the primary concentrator. 20 However, although the solar flux can be effectively "homogenized" with this strategy, it is at the expense of the angular distribution of the incident light which increases during this process. Figure 1 schematically depicts PV systems under concentrated sunlight conditions with and without homogenizers and shows the flux distribution and angular distribution of corresponding CPV system on the solar cell surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directly imaging the Sun onto the front surface of the solar cell results in a concentrated non‐uniform flux distribution, 17 which can lead to a non‐uniform photon‐generated current density and a consequent voltage drop arising from series resistance power losses in the emitter and contact/metal resistance losses of the solar cell 18,19 . Consequently, secondary optical elements, such as homogenizers, are employed to improve the homogeneity of the round focused flux that results from the primary concentrator 20 . However, although the solar flux can be effectively “homogenized” with this strategy, it is at the expense of the angular distribution of the incident light which increases during this process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%