2013
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/30/9/095007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical absorption measurements on crystalline silicon test masses at 1550 nm

Abstract: Abstract. Crystalline silicon is currently being discussed as test-mass material for future generations of gravitational wave detectors that will operate at cryogenic temperatures. We present optical absorption measurements on a large-dimension sample of crystalline silicon at a wavelength of 1550 nm at room temperature. The absorption was measured in a high intensity monolithic cavity setup using the photo-thermal self-phase modulation technique. The result for the absorption coefficient of this sample with a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both results are in good mutual agreement. Our absorption coefficient of α si (1550nm) ≈ 40 /cm found for the ion plated silicon layers of our coating stack is lower than values of 100 /cm up to 2000 /cm reported for a-Si [12][13][14], while for c-Si the absorption coefficient is only in the order of a few ppm/cm up to a few hundreds ppm/cm at 1550 nm [10,22,26]. Our result reveals a rather modest reduction of optical absorption for Si layers deposited by ion plating instead of the ion beam sputtering technique, and the coating investigated has an absorption that is still far too high for test mass mirrors in GWDs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Both results are in good mutual agreement. Our absorption coefficient of α si (1550nm) ≈ 40 /cm found for the ion plated silicon layers of our coating stack is lower than values of 100 /cm up to 2000 /cm reported for a-Si [12][13][14], while for c-Si the absorption coefficient is only in the order of a few ppm/cm up to a few hundreds ppm/cm at 1550 nm [10,22,26]. Our result reveals a rather modest reduction of optical absorption for Si layers deposited by ion plating instead of the ion beam sputtering technique, and the coating investigated has an absorption that is still far too high for test mass mirrors in GWDs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…At low intensities no non-linear contribution to the free-carrier absorption takes place. As outlined in [8], from the residual doping of the crystal an absorption coefficient of α ≈ 1 ppm/cm can be predicted, excluding this effect as a possible explanation for the observed high absorption values. The expected contribution is shown in trace (b) of Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Both the bulk absorption and the absorption in the surfaces beneath the HR Free-carrier absorption calculated for the residual doping in our sample (p-doping, N = 2 × 10 12 /cm 3 ) using the theory presented in [16]. (c, red circle) Total optical absorption in a prototype crystalline silicon test mass measured at an intensity of 2.2 kW/cm 2 and scaled to the cavity round-trip length [8]. (d, head-down blue triangle) Bulk absorption of a silicon crystal measured with a beam deflection approach at an intensity of 2.2 kW/cm 2 [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For practical devices, further reduction of the pump power is key, especially when it comes to integrated Kerr comb modules in which the available pump power is limited [52][53][54][55]. In this context, improvements in waveguide fabrication may allow reducing the linear propagation losses to values of, e.g., 0.4 dB cm −1 [56], which is well below the 2 dB cm −1 assumed in this work, but still far above the intrinsic absorption of silicon of less than 0.01 dB cm −1 at telecommunication wavelengths [57]. As an alternative or an addition to reversebiased p-i-n junctions, silicon self ion implantation may be used to reduce of the FC dwell time at the expense of slightly increased waveguide losses [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%