2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1923601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opt Out or Top Up? Voluntary Healthcare Insurance and the Public vs. Private Substitution

Abstract: ABSTRACT:We investigate whether people enrolled into voluntary health insurance (VHI) substitute public consumption with private (opt out) or just enlarge their private consumption, without reducing reliance upon public provisions (top up). We study the case of Italy, where a mixed insurance system is in place. To this purpose, we specify a joint model for public and private specialist visits counts, and allow for different degrees of endogenous supplementary insurance coverage, looking at the insurance covera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2004), professional occupational variables and labour market status are used as instruments -and therefore excluded from the visit equation, to avoid indenti…cation being based only on non-linearity. The usual argument here is that di¤erent employment sectors o¤er di¤erent opportunities to enroll into complementary health insurance schemes and also attract individuals with di¤erent degrees of risk aversion (Fabbri and Monfardini, 2011). Estimated coe¢ cients (presented in Table 6) are coherent with theoretical predictions and previous empirical research in the …eld.…”
Section: An Application To Healthcare Demandsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2004), professional occupational variables and labour market status are used as instruments -and therefore excluded from the visit equation, to avoid indenti…cation being based only on non-linearity. The usual argument here is that di¤erent employment sectors o¤er di¤erent opportunities to enroll into complementary health insurance schemes and also attract individuals with di¤erent degrees of risk aversion (Fabbri and Monfardini, 2011). Estimated coe¢ cients (presented in Table 6) are coherent with theoretical predictions and previous empirical research in the …eld.…”
Section: An Application To Healthcare Demandsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Recently, some attention has been devoted to the case of count data models with multinomial endogenous regressors. propose a simulation based full maximum likelihood method for single equation count data models (generalized to the case of multivariate counts by Fabbri and Monfardini, 2011). Zimmer (2010) adopts instead a two step procedure, following the suggestion of Terza et al (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Buchmuller et al 2004, professional occupational variables and labour market status are used as instruments -and therefore excluded from the visit equation, to avoid indenti…cation being based only on non-linearity. The usual argument here is that di¤erent employment sectors o¤er di¤erent opportunities to enroll into complementary health insurance schemes and also attract individuals with di¤erent degrees of risk aversion (Fabbri and Monfardini, 2011). Estimated coe¢ cients (presented in Table 6) are coherent with theoretical predictions and previous empirical research in the …eld.…”
Section: An Application To Healthcare Demandsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…From a consumer's point of view, both elements are important for his/her satisfaction. An increase in the patient's satisfaction can increase the probability he/she goes back to the same structure for treatment [27], developing certain forms of loyalty [28]; so, meeting the patient's requirements adequately reduces the out-flow from the public sector. Several authors study the correlation between an increase of waiting times in the public sector and a patients' shift from public to private supplementary health care or insurance [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%