2020
DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opt-in consent policies: potential barriers to hospital health information exchange

Abstract: Objectives: First, to assess whether hospitals in states requiring explicit patient consent ("optin") for health information exchange (HIE) are more likely to report regulatory barriers to HIE. Second, to analyze whether these policies correlate with hospital volume of HIE.Study Design: Cross-sectional analysis of US non-federal acute care hospitals in 2016. Methods:We combined legal scholarship surveying HIE-relevant state laws with the AHA Annual IT Supplement for regulatory barriers and hospital characteris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While developed as intended safeguards, these restrictive policies may be misaligned with patients’ preferences for greater access to their information, and have the unintended consequence of reducing the exchange of heath information. For example, Apathy and colleagues 55 found that the administrative and legal burdens of opt-in regulations decreased health organizations’ capacity to engage in provider HIE. Similarly, in their study of patient portal use within a safety-net ambulatory clinic, Ancker and colleagues 56 found significant racial and socioeconomic disparities existed when patients had to opt in to receive a portal account; however, racial differences in portal use disappeared when universal (i.e., opt-out) policies were installed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While developed as intended safeguards, these restrictive policies may be misaligned with patients’ preferences for greater access to their information, and have the unintended consequence of reducing the exchange of heath information. For example, Apathy and colleagues 55 found that the administrative and legal burdens of opt-in regulations decreased health organizations’ capacity to engage in provider HIE. Similarly, in their study of patient portal use within a safety-net ambulatory clinic, Ancker and colleagues 56 found significant racial and socioeconomic disparities existed when patients had to opt in to receive a portal account; however, racial differences in portal use disappeared when universal (i.e., opt-out) policies were installed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over half (56.8%) of Caucasian respondents expressed preferences for an opt-out policy, while less than half (38.3%-48.3%) of non-White respondents (Native Americans, African-Americans, Latinos, and Asian/Pacific Islanders) preferred an opt-out policy. Apathy and Holmgren examined regulatory barriers and consent policies regarding data sharing and exchange of individual hospitals [ 5 ]. They found that in states with opt-in consent requirements for HIE, there was overall less HIE than in states that allowed opt-out consent for HIE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthcare organizations operating in an opt-in policy environment, as were all the HIOs in this study, face greater administrative burdens. 27 Problematically, healthcare organizations and HIOs have limited options for eliminating consent challenges as patient consent requirements are defined at the state and federal levels. 28 Mitigation is a more likely path through such efforts as simplifying consent language, consenting through the patient portal and EHR, and incorporating broader members of the care team in the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%