1960
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-196042060-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposition of the Thumb and Its Restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

1977
1977
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Maximal circumduction was defined as touching the proximal phalanx of the little finger [21,33]. Jacobs and Thompson proposed a classification scoring opposition as good, fair, and poor, using criteria as the angie of the plane of the thumb nail in relation to the plane of the palm [20] with good being less than 30" compared to the contralateral thumb, fair 50", and poor over 50" [29]. MacFarlane stated that simply asking the patient to oppose the thumb to the fingers is unreliable and felt that circumduction (not the diagnosis) rested upon the interpretation of the degree of pronation of the thumb with respect to the finger tips [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maximal circumduction was defined as touching the proximal phalanx of the little finger [21,33]. Jacobs and Thompson proposed a classification scoring opposition as good, fair, and poor, using criteria as the angie of the plane of the thumb nail in relation to the plane of the palm [20] with good being less than 30" compared to the contralateral thumb, fair 50", and poor over 50" [29]. MacFarlane stated that simply asking the patient to oppose the thumb to the fingers is unreliable and felt that circumduction (not the diagnosis) rested upon the interpretation of the degree of pronation of the thumb with respect to the finger tips [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carpometacarpal and metacarpalphalangeal joints are complex with ligamentous structures and intrinsic and extrinsic muscles loading the joints in the circumduction motion [18,19]. Published methods have limited clinical application due to: radiographic exposure [6]; failure to measure rotation [ 1 I , 12,321; allowing motions other than circumduction; lacking quantative data [1,12,20,29,32]; lacking validation to interpret the data; and failure to define the start and end postions [20,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,30,31 Although our pa- tients had severe chronic CTS and although endoscopic CTR does not allow for neurolysis, the literature clearly shows that neurolysis and neurotomy are not indicated during CTR because they have not been proven beneficial and may increase nerve scarring and adhesions. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] It is important to consider that part of the benefit our patients experienced through the combined procedure may have been a result of the endoscopic method of our CTRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Der M. flexor digitorum superficialis hat die Vorteile ausreichender Kraft und Amplitude, von mehr als der benötigten Län-ge und ist ein unabhängiger willkürlich isoliert beweglicher Muskel. Ein Nachteil liegt in der gelegentlich auftretenden Beugekontraktur des Ringfingermittelgelenkes nach Sehnenentnahme [14].…”
Section: Opponensplastik Mit M Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Ivunclassified