2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposition effect of Trojan asteroids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At phase angles less than 5°, an opposition surge is observed; this is now understood as due to coherent backscattering, as it is stronger for higher albedo surfaces (Muinonen et al 2002). Phase curves for Trojan asteroids are linear down to phase angles of ~0.1-0.2° (Shevchenko et al 2012). This linear behavior differs dramatically from the sharp opposition spikes seen in several Centaurs, and is similar to what is observed for dark outer Main Belt and Hilda asteroids (Shevchenko et al 2012).…”
Section: Rotational States and Phase Curvesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At phase angles less than 5°, an opposition surge is observed; this is now understood as due to coherent backscattering, as it is stronger for higher albedo surfaces (Muinonen et al 2002). Phase curves for Trojan asteroids are linear down to phase angles of ~0.1-0.2° (Shevchenko et al 2012). This linear behavior differs dramatically from the sharp opposition spikes seen in several Centaurs, and is similar to what is observed for dark outer Main Belt and Hilda asteroids (Shevchenko et al 2012).…”
Section: Rotational States and Phase Curvesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Phase curves for Trojan asteroids are linear down to phase angles of ~0.1-0.2° (Shevchenko et al 2012). This linear behavior differs dramatically from the sharp opposition spikes seen in several Centaurs, and is similar to what is observed for dark outer Main Belt and Hilda asteroids (Shevchenko et al 2012). Shevchenko et al (2012) attribute the absence of a strong opposition surge to the low albedos of Trojan asteroids.…”
Section: Rotational States and Phase Curvesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Absolute magnitudes, H R , were computed from the apparent magnitudes using the inverse square law and the HG formalism (Bowell et al 1989) with assumed phase angle parameter G = 0.15, as is appropriate for dark surfaces. The phase darkening coefficients are unmeasured, however, introducing some uncertainty into H R , particularly if the Trojans should show significant opposition surge (although available evidence from the Jovian Trojans indicates that they do not; Shevchenko et al 2012). Values of H R are quoted only to one decimal place in recognition of this phase function uncertainty.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model has experienced several improvements with more physical description since its introduction in the 1980s (Hapke 1993(Hapke , 2002(Hapke , 2008(Hapke , 2012, which is the reason that there are several different versions. For a comet that is expected to be composed of dark phases rich in carbon, the coherent-backscattering mechanism (Shevchenko & Belskaya 2010;Shevchenko et al 2012) is not expected to play a major role. For the single-particle-phase function, we adopted the single-term of the Henyey-Greenstein (HG) form (Hapke 2012), with one asymmetry parameter, g. A negative g value represents backscattering, a positive one forward scattering, and g = 0 stands for isotropic scattering.…”
Section: Hapke Model On Disk-averaged Photometrymentioning
confidence: 99%