2014
DOI: 10.1038/srep06829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposite metabolic responses of shoots and roots to drought

Abstract: Shoots and roots are autotrophic and heterotrophic organs of plants with different physiological functions. Do they have different metabolomes? Do their metabolisms respond differently to environmental changes such as drought? We used metabolomics and elemental analyses to answer these questions. First, we show that shoots and roots have different metabolomes and nutrient and elemental stoichiometries. Second, we show that the shoot metabolome is much more variable among species and seasons than is the root me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
120
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
18
120
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, shoots and roots may vie and collaborate for the functions that a plant requirement. A decrease in roots growth often precedes the decrease of shoots growth (Huang et al, 2012;Gargallo-Garriga et al, 2014). This is reason to explain why total dry weight responses of LAR was identified between rice and wheat.…”
Section: Effects Of Temperature On Plant Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, shoots and roots may vie and collaborate for the functions that a plant requirement. A decrease in roots growth often precedes the decrease of shoots growth (Huang et al, 2012;Gargallo-Garriga et al, 2014). This is reason to explain why total dry weight responses of LAR was identified between rice and wheat.…”
Section: Effects Of Temperature On Plant Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes in metabolomic profiles were associated with changes in the elemental composition and stoichiometry of the organisms [32,35]. Changes in the chemical composition of plants under drought and/or warming affect the palatability of plants and therefore the frequency of herbivorous attack [33,36,37]. Aerial organs and roots of the same plant can also respond oppositely to drought and warming [36,37].…”
Section: Responses At the Molecular Level And In The Use Of Chemical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the chemical composition of plants under drought and/or warming affect the palatability of plants and therefore the frequency of herbivorous attack [33,36,37]. Aerial organs and roots of the same plant can also respond oppositely to drought and warming [36,37]. The concentration of primary metabolites associated with protein synthesis and energy production, such as amino acids and sugars, and N, P and K concentrations increased in roots, whereas activities of the primary metabolic pathways associated with growth and N, P and K concentrations decreased in the aerial organs.…”
Section: Responses At the Molecular Level And In The Use Of Chemical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dry season is characterized by high VPD (>2 kPa), which is linked to the reduction in evapotranspiration due to low PAW. With the reduction/closure of stomatal conductance, plants deactivate metabolic activity in the shoots to reduce consumption of water (and subsequent transpiration) while simultaneously enhancing uptake of water and nutrients by the roots to mitigate the effect of the dry season [75]. In the wetter savanna systems of the humid region (>750 mm of mean annual precipitation, MAP), it has been shown that a considerable amount of C is stored in the roots at the start of the dry season and is subsequently used by the herbaceous vegetation to re-sprout at the start of the next growing season [76].…”
Section: Relationship Between Ec Gpp Paw Vpd and Apimentioning
confidence: 99%