2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-011-0593-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposite Effects of Polyols on Antibody Aggregation: Thermal Versus Mechanical Stresses

Abstract: Preferentially excluded polyols increase the conformational stability of proteins but also increase their chemical potential in the solution phase. This increase in free energy can promote precipitation and interfacial adsorption of a protein as these reactions result in a decrease in its free energy. Therefore, addition of polyols can be destabilizing for the physical stability of aqueous protein formulations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with earlier reports, showing that polyols are excellent protein stabilizers [34]. Yet, their stabilizing effect cannot be fully generalized because ethylene glycol has also been reported as thermal destabilizer [35]. Among the other studied co‐solvents, the least deleterious to catalytic activities of DbjA, DhaA, and LinB was DMSO, followed by methanol and DMF, whereas co‐solvents with hydrophobicity parameter log P higher than –0.35 (especially THF, 1,4‐dioxane and acetonitrile) were weakly tolerated (Supporting information, Table S4 and Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result is consistent with earlier reports, showing that polyols are excellent protein stabilizers [34]. Yet, their stabilizing effect cannot be fully generalized because ethylene glycol has also been reported as thermal destabilizer [35]. Among the other studied co‐solvents, the least deleterious to catalytic activities of DbjA, DhaA, and LinB was DMSO, followed by methanol and DMF, whereas co‐solvents with hydrophobicity parameter log P higher than –0.35 (especially THF, 1,4‐dioxane and acetonitrile) were weakly tolerated (Supporting information, Table S4 and Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…2c and 3). These observations are consistent with earlier reports that sucrose prevented the formation of soluble aggregates and slowed the rate of monomer loss in two different mAbs63,64 and a recombinant human interferon‐γ 65. Increases in the thermal stability of the native state were also associated with an increase in the free energy of unfolding in the presence of different sugars66 and in proportion to sucrose concentration67 in several different proteins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Because the stability of antibody molecules is primarily determined by structural features, identification of aggregation-prone motifs in IgG sequences and molecular modeling are implemented as screening tools in the development of stable products (41,42). Additionally, use of appropriate formulation excipients and process buffers is essential to mitigate aggregation (43,44).…”
Section: Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%