2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposing prognostic roles of nuclear and cytoplasmic RACGAP1 expression in colorectal cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, patients with positive RacGAP1 protein expression at the invasive front of gastric cancer showed poorer prognosis than those without it . Interestingly, colorectal cancer patients had opposite prognoses depending on the site of RacGAP1 expression, in that patients with high nuclear RacGAP1 expression had poor outcomes, whereas those with high cytoplasmic RacGAP1 expression had favorable prognoses. It is fascinating that different localization of RacGAP1 may drive distinct signaling pathways and opposite effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, patients with positive RacGAP1 protein expression at the invasive front of gastric cancer showed poorer prognosis than those without it . Interestingly, colorectal cancer patients had opposite prognoses depending on the site of RacGAP1 expression, in that patients with high nuclear RacGAP1 expression had poor outcomes, whereas those with high cytoplasmic RacGAP1 expression had favorable prognoses. It is fascinating that different localization of RacGAP1 may drive distinct signaling pathways and opposite effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Similarly, patients with positive RacGAP1 protein expression at the invasive front of gastric cancer showed poorer prognosis than those without it. 20 Interestingly, colorectal cancer patients had opposite prognoses depending on the site of RacGAP1 expression, 26 in that patients resistance was reported to be mediated by RacGAP1-dependent activation of AKT. Knockdown of RacGAP1 in HNSCC cells showed slower growth and sensitized the cytotoxic actions of doxorubicin in mice models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Similarly, RACGAP1 overexpression has been reported in several cancers, including breast, colorectal, squamous cell, gastric, uterine, and hepatocellular, and has been linked to increased recurrence and poor prognosis. [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] Hence, it appears that pro-tumorigenic ARH-GAP11A and RACGAP1 functions might be conserved between cancer types. Future work should aim to clarify the mechanisms that control the activity of these GAPs in cancer, particularly for ARHGAP11A, of which little is known regarding its regulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Interestingly, a recent study suggested that colorectal cancer patients had a worse prognosis when RACGAP1 was highly expressed in the nucleus compared to the cytoplasm. 49 The ability of ARHGAP11A to regulate the cell cycle is presumably linked to its nuclear localization, and future studies should aim to identify ARHGAP11A binding partners so that the exact mechanism of cell cycle control can be determined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RACGAP1 has been correlated with poor outcomes in various tumor types, including breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, epithelial ovarian cancer, esophageal carcinoma, and invasive cervical cancer [43][44][45][46][47][48]. Interestingly, RACGAP1 was reported to be a target gene of mutant p53 [49,50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%