1995
DOI: 10.2307/1164513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunity-to-Learn Effects on Achievement: Analytical Aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, students who worked more than one hour each day performed slightly lower on average compared to the students spending time on math homework every day (Rodriguez, 2004). The opportunity to learn could help increase student learning and improve teaching (Muthen et al, 1995). A significant relationship was found between allocated to learning time & reading scores, allocated to learning time & mathematics test scores (Brown & Saks, 1986) and the students' attitude toward learning and math achievement (Beaton et al, 1996;Abu-Hilal, 2000).…”
Section: Student-level Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, students who worked more than one hour each day performed slightly lower on average compared to the students spending time on math homework every day (Rodriguez, 2004). The opportunity to learn could help increase student learning and improve teaching (Muthen et al, 1995). A significant relationship was found between allocated to learning time & reading scores, allocated to learning time & mathematics test scores (Brown & Saks, 1986) and the students' attitude toward learning and math achievement (Beaton et al, 1996;Abu-Hilal, 2000).…”
Section: Student-level Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage of the OTL approach to assessing instructional sensitivity is that data collection and measurement of classroom practice can be expensive and time consuming. To appropriately carry out an OTL study, these measurements of classroom practice need to be made precisely and in detail for each specific context (Muthén et al, 1995). Although many methods and measures are available, the heterogeneity of instruction from one intervention study to another makes capturing their impact accurately a continuing challenge.…”
Section: Instructional Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OTL studies of sensitivity also should include background characteristics of students in the analyses (Burstein et al, 1989;Muthén et al, 1995). Various methods have been proposed to account for the relationships between OTL, prior performance, student background, and achievement.…”
Section: Instructional Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If differentiated instruction is common, then valid attempts to measure students' exposure to reform-oriented practices might have to take place at the student level rather than at the teacher level (Gamoran, 1991;Muthen et al, 1995)-for example, through student surveys. However, some earlier research casts doubt on the accuracy of such surveys when specialized terminology and complex instructional practice are involved (see, e.g., Burstein et al, 1995, andHerman, Klein, andAbedi, 2000).…”
Section: Explaining Weak Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%